It is fake until proven otherwise.
Uts existence needs to be proven. Until then the missle just doesnr exist.
And its not like the topic isnonly a few days old now
1 Like
goes for literally most modern weaponry, that’s also the reason why im so against the devs pushing in more and more modern stuff into the game.
but hell, what do i know
Most modern vehicles are proven to have existed and be functional.
Do we have their specific specs? No.
But we know they work and can perform.
The same csnt be said about KH-38MT
1 Like
if im not mistaken its the beute KV-2
1 Like
I feel like a system where bug report moderators can rate the reports they get by the effect to gameplay if fixed, then have those looked at first would be a good idea. A lot of significant buffs and nerfs sometimes come from bug reports that were started 1 to 2 years ago and have been in the queue to be worked on for a long time
Update to this: This has now been changed. It’s all missiles with FoV reduction IRCCM.
12 Likes
Will we see an update to the missile lock circles so they display the FoV change during lock-on?
F/A-18F my beloved. there is the option for Australia to get it too since they never brought the E
If the update is live and they haven’t changed that, then another report should be made unless Smin can clarify it will be changed
Hello Smin,
It seems that, while the bug report was implemented, no visual clue change was implemented.
In particular, the lock circle is not shrinking upon acquiring a lock, as shown in the following videos for both Magic 2 and Mistral.
Should another bug report be made about this?
Thanks.
(Nevermind me eating a tree in my Tiger)
1 Like
3 Likes
What about a new damage model system for aircraft? The aircraft damage model we have now is just broken up into sections with some internals. How about a grain model system so that bullets actually make holes and tears the armor, this would keep aircraft intact when getting hit once.
Just take the current models of aircraft and change the why they take damage. (Yea I over simplfied it.)
1 Like
So Gaijin clearly isnt against the idea of RB EC, what they oppose is the duration of the games. As clearly proven by actively shortening game durations the last years.
They aren’t against Air RB EC, they are against making the grind not painful
Providing Air RB EC to allow players to benefit from the long mission time and engaging gameplay is against their principles
1 Like
GAIJIN … WE NEED THE F-22 in the next UPDATEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
Brother you just got 3 F/A-18’s so no and deal with it
2 Likes
Certainly not, do you know how much stuff needs to come before it?
2 Likes
Sensor fusion and realistic radar/IR signatures come to mind. cough cough the F-5C being colder than an F-117 cough cough
18 Likes
At least two more Typhoons and maybe with a cherry on top via a Commonwealth Hornet lol
1 Like