The Tejas Mk1A definitely wouldn’t be 13.7 lol, the Mk1 maybe, but not the Mk1A
You should also specify the variants of the Vampire, Canberra, Hunter, Su-7, MiG-21, 23 and 29 and put the Ajeet in the Gnats place
The Ajeet is foldered with the Gnat, I’m gonna try to find the variants for the others
Pretty sure their older equipment has nothing to do with Gaijins decision to add them as a British subtree lol
Here : Squadron vehicles: T-90 Bhishma
" First and foremost, we’d like to let you know the reasons as to why we’re going to be adding this vehicle to the British tree. Britain’s top-tier MBTs are generally niche and are typically geared towards methodical combat engagements. Because of this, additional export MBTs and other vehicles that have ties to some Commonwealth nations will allow for more options and new approaches to Britain’s gameplay. We’d like to note that we are continuing to work on filling the British ground forces tree, which will include various armored, infantry fighting vehicles, and light tanks. These are planned for the future."
2 Likes
Alr, I understand. I don’t play ground but I understand your pain
1 Like
+ Smin’s staments.
3 Likes
People have already done that when India was announced to be british sub tree. There’s no point of bringing back old topics, India is a british sub tree and there’s nothing we can do now.
which Vampire should it be? The IAF used all of these: F.3, FB.52, NF.10, NF.54, T.55, PR.55, T.11
And also which Hunter, the IAF used all of these: FGA.56, T.66, F.56
There’s nothing we can do napoleon gif with that one music
1 Like
🙂
3 Likes
For the Vampires at least the FB.52, but adding the F.3 and NF.54 wouldn’t hurt
For the Hunter the F.56 and FGA.56
For reference, the T.XX versions are twin-seat trainers and the PR.55 is a photo recon plane
1 Like
So, folders for both? Also the Canberra can be either B(I).58 or B(I).66, which one is the best to add?
… and we’re back
2 Likes
The Hunters should be foldered, the Vampires could be foldered, but they do differ a lot more than the Hunters do.
Not sure how much the Canberras differ, the B(I).66 would be easier to add though, as it’s just a refurbished B(I).6. The B(I).58 would be a slightly different (uglier) variant with similar specs but a different cockpit/canopy layout
3 Likes
This part is often forgotten after Inida became a sub-tree but due to the F-111C, it’s clear the statement it still in play where they’ll add vehicles from all over the commonwealth if the feel the UK can use it/it have request behind it.
1 Like
Canadian Leos in UK still makes sense.
UK already has Leo 2’s gun & its whole hull in its TT.
Leo 2s under France makes little sense, wasn’t required.
Arjun has no commonality with the Brits.
2 Likes
I mean, the Canadian Leo boat has pretty much sailed and the Abrams AIM is off the list as well.
The Arjun may have nothing to do with Britain, but it is more fitting than the Indian T-series tanks
The american tech tree only lack F-86 with AIM-9B
F11F-1 early short nose and without radar
but F4D-1 (early) slightly worse event vehicle, and fitted Pratt & Whitney J57-P-2 engine
At present, no F-80B-1
Battle rating same the P-59A ?
Maybe FH-1 Phantom
1 or 2 variants after F-80C-10.
F-94A & F-94B BR around 8.3 ~ 8.7 ?
F7U-1 with J34-WE-32 engines afterburning or non-afterburning ?
I don’t know much about this
The USA in Rank VI already 3 event vehicle, but no the early aircraft premium golden eagle
If F7U-3M outfitted Westinghouse J46-WE-8B engine, max speed at sea level giving a 678 mph (1,091 km/h)
F7U-3 early fitted Allison J35-A-29 engine (none-afterburning)
But F7U-3 (Iate) equipped J46-WE-8 or J46-WE-8A engine with an afterburning capability
I think you forgot about the L7.
1 Like
They are very similar. Aged design, 120mm rifled guns, and just being questionable in every aspect lol.
1 Like