Judging by how some of their latest new/different air to ground weapons were implemented I’d really prefer if they just didn’t add any more new things that could be exciting.
No need to repeat the TV Martel and Brimstone fiascos
True… unfortunately.
Maybe i’ll just hold out for Sea Eagles this year
- 9 fighter aircraft decompression to 14.7
- 3 fighter increase max BR to 14.3
- 4 fighter BR up to 14.0
9 aircraft, I think
Forgot about that.
Why was it necessary to introduce these premiums? The Swede’s rating is hidden, as far as I understand, it is automatically hidden if it is below 2
Not only that but why the price jump from 64.99 when we should be paying 59.99.
The F/A-18 is 0.3 BR higher than the F-20.
1 Like
I mean, why would they not add these as premiums? (The blatant pay to win aspect of the premium Netz having more CMs than the tech tree variant at the same BR aside)
I’d rather have mediocre or even bad premiums than unique stuff be locked behind a paywall.
The problem is that any player can buy them and get eaten by 13.7-14.0, which is evident from their rating. Other rank 8 premiums also have low ratings
You say that as if this was something new
There are a dozen messages like that I wish I could disable. Actually. I wish I could disable all of them. Only one that is slightly useful is the one for confirming which wing sweep mode im in. But could live without
I mean players aren’t the issue as you can kill them to grind the tree efficiently, the issue is the obvious price tag rising for no purpose. No one wants extra GE or PT as most players could buy two years worth with the same price on sale.
Sorry, I assumed you had napalm. Lets just get the napalm to your planes then. I think that’s much better than trying to implement CBU’s right now.
I see talk on clusterbombs. me want clusterbombs to just level a point of all cover (especially the town objective on tunisia)
1 Like
The problem is, it might not be possible.
Gaijin is really wierd when it comes to giving Britain weapons it didnt actually use even though equivalent airframes do for other nations (i.e F4J(US) has Napalm F4J(UK) does not). Though does the opposite all the time (Only Britain should technically have PW4s on their Typhoon)
Britain reserved the right to use Napalm and its entirely possible that the Harriers, Jags, Phantoms and even maybe the Tornado could have used them. But nothing concrete. Only the Buc and Sea Vixen have it specifically listed in the manuals (and has been reported a while ago as I said, but still nothing). CBUs are the weapon that mostly replaced Napalm though and then Brimstones replaced CBUs.
So the issue becomes. Will they? Im not massively fussed that they havent, but it does create quite a notable im-balance imo. Especially when things like the Tornado have to try and race an F-4S or Mig-23ML with Napalm to a base. Khorne is right, maybe the better solution is to just nerf Napalm. But still. Theyd be fun to use and were considered the primary weapon for dealing with tanks by the Tornado Gr1.
Tornado GR1 preferred weapons - Shared by Gunjob previously
So quite a vital part of our loadout is missing. If nothing else. I think they could test it via a test event. Because turth is. No one knows how they would actually perform/affect GRB.
Well. Large AOE weapons in GRB will be a huge pain, a literal “clustf*ck”. But just about every nation has them…
Methinks Napalm to the UK and/or some sort of work on Brimstone to not make it OP as hell with ground radar tracking might be the best way to go for now.
1 Like
We bought latest gen Spike NLOS as a stopgap for our Apaches
Yeah, perhaps, still would like to see a test event though.
1 Like
Oh heck yeah. In the context of a test event. Absolutely. I just know that live, in GRB, a lot of people are going to get TK’d, and I’m not sure what symbology is going to be present in using them, if any, but it’s going to be hard to know how to even get a good drop with them I’d imagine. Will be super fun. Especially if the Tornados get those big a$$ dispensers on them.