Sounds reasonable. DDGs or subs, and probably looking at post-treaty battleships like littorio or bismarck.
Wouldn’t be surprised if we get a couple more packs like the Two Fronts Pack. USA and USSR and maybe (with much hopium) Britain.
2 Likes
In that can we have the Canadian Leo please : P
2 Likes
Well tbf the Brits doesnt really need a new premium. Arguably a new battleship but ground and air are well covered, the CR1 RSDG is pretty decent and the junk, despite being junk, can still do its job. Same for the bison.
2 Likes
Schizo time once again, Germany gets Bismarck, US gets shafted
Very true, we don’t need a new premium. Then again neither did Germany and nor does the USA and USSR. My love for authentic drip and Gaijin’s potential new-found love for premium tank bundles may well disregard this though.
Realistically, what would be a British premium though? Strv 8x/10x or shot kal are out of question, something like the king hussein MBT with falcon turret would be too cool to miss out on the TT.
A premium bundle for Britain does kinda exist, it is the D-Day pack this year, containing achilles, tyrenizc, typhoon and a spitfire. Id guess an actual prem bundle would be something like cold war AOTR package with two chieftains, a warrior and a swingfire in a bundle.
1 Like
I hope they do more triplet pack in this update
I think that I wasn’t clear enough in either of my comments. I was intending to talk about analogs to the new German bundle (2x Tigers and an Ostwind II). If it were added I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s something along the lines of a Firefly with camo-net, Churchill VII with nick nacks, and a Crusader SPAA or Comet with camo-net, Challenger with camo-net, Skink.
My thinking is going along the lines of Rank ~III, popular(ish) vehicles, of a similar BR to create a premium bundle lineup with, if that makes more sense?
Edit: A BAOR bundle is a cool concept though.
3 Likes
And ofc the F-5T is missing AIM-9Ms (which I wasnt fully expecting) and its still missing its underwing missles because for whatever reason Gaijin thinks the SCU would be less advanced then the FCU…
3 Likes
But you don’t understand, look at all the top tier aircraft we added to the US.
Aren’t you happy with being neglected as a naval/ground player just for a bunch of top tier aircraft?
4 Likes
Sarcasm not allowed m8 lol
1 Like
60s reload for north carolina, have fun
It’s also still an early F-5E model, while it should be a late one with larger LERX and is missing AGM-65D
It’s amazing how the only thing they changed about the Thai vehicles from dev is that the F-16A OCU that should have 120 CMs (60 from ALE-47 in the tail, 60 from additional ALE-40) now somehow has only 45, making it the least CMs of any F-16
6 Likes
With the outrage this update is incurring I can only imagine we will get the FA18 Super hornet with limited armament, SU30 variant, and hopefully massive big fixes and new game modes!
1 Like
It just irks me its missing the underwing missles which its predecessor has, and it doesnt have the MFDs in its cockpit (afaik)
1 Like
What outrage ?
You just got a powerful F-15, you don’t need to be the star’s in every update
2 Likes
It has one, which is accurate. The full glass cockpit is for the F-5TH (Third Capability Upgrade). But it does have the wrong HUD iirc
3 Likes
hey @Smin1080p_WT Are there any plans to eliminate aim-120 from the F-16A OCU? Many players do not like non-historic armament except for balancing
2 Likes
Especially since it uses AN/APG-66(V)1 radar, which is not AMRAAM capable at all.
“AN/APG-66S” it has in game is a fictional radar based on a typo that meant “APG-66s” as in the multiple of any APG-66 series radar.