If they hadn’t introduced India as a British subtree I might agree with you, but becoming a subtree shouldn’t then reduce the variety of vehicles that should be added
Why?
Youre using 2 entirely different case
In one - there is that Nation(As sub-tt of GB)
In another - theres no such nation, so it goes into origin nation
I mean, its not too late for India to become its own thing, but sadly Gaijin seems stuck in their mindset that India isn’t big enough to be its own tree (yet they still plan on adding more trees)
Anyways, if we could just get that subtree rework everyone could be happy
The thing is Gaijin will almost never add something that a TT actually needs unless we either fight tooth and nail for it or it’s a premium.
I mean it’s never technically too late, Gaijin can always change things, but they’ve never done it before, and like like you said, they’ve already ruled out India as a full tree so it’s likely here to stay, I at least want it to be worth something if it is
well it already does/did since ages …
I wonder why they stopped doing captured vehicles and lend-lease vehicles for opposing nations🤔
Spoiler
Well, for Air and Ground anyways… they seem to have found a new niche with the Murmansk and Arkhangelsk
I don’t understand this obsession of people wanting the UK to have a su30, russia still doesn’t have a plane to compete with the eurofighter and the rafale, when will they finally have something to compete with these two, now everyone wants the su30 for everyone else tts? It doesn’t seem fair in my opinion and if you followed this idea the UK would have the eurofighter, the su30mki and the rafale, it’s just ridiculous, the UK doesn’t need anything at the moment for air, russia and china do need better things to compete
1 Like
I guess I can have an opinion on this since I did suggest the MKI, but imo I don’t think it should come soon or whatever, as Britain doesn’t need it yet, as they literally got the EFT this update. Tejas would be cool tho, I guess.
5 Likes
it’s not that same, in low br, everyone has many domestic vehicles, one or two C&P is not so harmful to TT’s character, but in higher and higher br, choices are becoming fewer and fewer, most TT need these TT to keep their character.
No need necessarily for the Rafale, but the MKI is India’s most used fighter, so having an Indian subtree without it would be weird, the Rafale also fits the same spot in the tree as the Typhoon which creates a conflict, whereas the MKI would likely come after the Tornado F.3, which is a dead end line, there are no other British aircraft that could come there, the MKI also doesn’t need to come in the same update, as you said Britain just got the Eurofighter, still by June it would be fine I think
but there is also no NEED for the mki, right? I mean, EF is enough, at least for now.
im fine with that tbh, let russia have something for at least one update and then add the MKI
it’s true.
but to be honest, when it comes, there will also be a very big problem, the DF-105/SK-105 things would happen again.
They dont do that often, f16 wasn’t exclusive, gripen wasn’t, su27 wasn’t, f15 wasnt ect ect
Id rather see nations with only one viable rank 8 vehicle with fox 3 get like 2 or so more vehicles so they have diversity. I think Japan rn with Thai has 3 Fox 3 carrying gen 4 aircraft. Which is one of the smaller trees.
1 Like
they did that with the 29s tho (but it was a weird thing to do ngl)
Again one time thing they haven’t repeated aside from AV8B
some are necessary, some not. I’m always ok with the necessary part, but the rest, I feel sad
1 Like
There is nothing wrong with trees having fewer choices at the top end, especially when it comes to planes.
And as someone that tries to get into sim, a lot of this C&P actually is harmful.
1 Like
i mean, again, considering that the UK got the EF, they dont NEED the MKI rn thats the point, so why not just hold for idk 1 update? just let russia have something good and unique :(
yeah i agree with you
1 Like
Oh oh oh as if they not just had about 5 updates with unique jets already