Still will have the exagerated turret ring as a weakspot.
Which is why adding the Sep V3 will not solve the issues. As we have seen with adding CR3 TD
Depends, even if steel then that would be sth more akin to 500mm hull, which I think is quite nice, cause tanks with 3BM42 equivalents and so on can’t pen abrams on the hull, whilst top tier rounds up front goes through all the same. And also at an angle non DM53 top tier rounds will also struggle. Will move ABRAMS to leopard tier though due to the reload.
u mean this?
It can be ground focused, since not much job to do to add some new Flanker.
True, but also what ground vehicles are to add, even with new flankers being c + v FMs, it will still be ‘work’ and we can’t then expect too much from ground vehicles.
This is the “simulate vehicle” I said, actually still a SEPV2, but modified to simulate SEPV3, the plates are steel bob-weight to simulate new armor pack
What do V3s look like then?
Like this? I don’t see any additional armour though. Also what’s the weight?
1 Like
the armor is thicker, I remember someone measured it by tape measure, and the structure of the NERA in LPF could be changed to contain more KE plate
Actually yeah, it does look slightly more tilted than earlier variants and a little thicker.
They should come regardless, not replacing the only AGM/TGP combo they given israel to date.
If they came out and said they are willing to add popeyes or a nerfed Delilah/rampage then the mavericks can go, but no one wants to sacrifice standoff AGMs for standoff SPICE if we can just keep both
Man when are next br changes
I need AIM-9M on the F14B
fr.
I’m sick of every nation getting vehicles they should not get just for the sake of those vehicles being present in every damn tree. If this vehicle historically served with this country’s military and was also modified somehow I get it, but crap like the Dutch Leopard 2s in the French tank tree is super annoying.
Subtrees should have a different progression system, they should be somehow seperate from the main tree itself.
5 Likes
If it does not come with its datalink feature, Delilah would just function like a smaller AGM-65 with bigger lock range (16km on moving targets iirc) and attacking targets at a high angle like how the French AASMs and other winged bombs present ingame behave. The Delilah’s 250km range can only be used with its datalink feature. Also, you can only take a maximum of 2 of these.
RAMPAGE would be decent to see. Not as useful as CAS but would be fun in air RB and EC.
1 Like
And for the US its gonna be 2 Shermans and the Skink, all in special camo nets. Because if there is one thing the US needs more than anything its more Shermans
or 2 Pershings and an M42
1 Like
Once again this is why this is absolutely needed.
Basically make sub-trees “mini nations” under a full nation they are closest related too with a separate TT.
9 Likes
currently, all IR seekers are almost same on moving targets, it’s a limit/balance
We need this ASAP
1 Like
It would solve loads of problems with the current sub-trees.
1 Like
Air has room to go where ground is pretty much caught up. Regardless, we will 100% get top tier aircraft next update. Could be F-2, could be F-18s, etc etc
ground has reached the current day already
air is still 20 years behind, however air is already 2 full BRs above ground in capabilities
1 Like