Ah yes the 5a, the trainers would be cool but like the Jag T2 etc its basically the same thing but with a friend
1 Like
PGM’s on the Gr1 are nice but TIALD pod isn’t the greatest
GR7 is better with 4x Aim-9m + 4x Maverick G but same issue with TIALD
1 Like
I mean I have played the German one and I can research the Italian one but yeah the US and Russia got more powerful CAS platforms than we do, so anything else that helps us with that is appreciated.
I just don’t get the purist mindset.
I don’t like sub trees in nations they should of been added as a independent tree.
There are far too many independent trees in War thunder, why do they keep adding more ?
More nations brings more C&P (cries a essay)
1 Like
I don’t see the issue with giving nations stuff they used after all tech-trees represent the nation, not the industry.
No don’t get me wrong Gaijin has messed up with how sub-trees are currently added but we all know what fix is needed for that(Nations Folders). And as for the fact, that we get a C&P before a domestic equivalent where possible is annoying but as long as they get probably foldered after(underneath the domestic) it’s all fine to me.
5 Likes
Plus they will moan about the country not being playable lol
We’ve already infected Aus with people coming to do Fifo work in the mines.
The wheels are already in motion…
Cogs are turning…
Bogans and Essex scaffolders in the same tech tree
brother that is a T72
M60 based
that’s a BTR 50
yes I did
Was Yugoslavia not part of the USSR for most of its existence, and then did it collapse as the USSR collapsed?
as for the Serbs, its a T72 with a new name
It is loosely based on the T-90M. It is not just a T-72.
Still unique.
Still unique.
No, you didn’t.
No, it wasn’t.
No, it didn’t.
Tell me you know nothing about Serbian vehicles…
2 Likes
The first version is just a license produced T-72M, yes, however not only is it not Serbian like you said, but rather Yugoslav, but even the second variant, the M-84A, is quite different.
On top of this, every Serbian variant is very distinctly unique.
1 Like
A slightly different add on armour pack or engine to a T72 doesn’t make it a unique tank mate. Do you also call every mark of all other tanks distinctively unique? because they arent. Khalid is still a chieftain, Fahris is still a warrior, Vidar is still a K9 thunder, there may be a modification but its still almost entirely the vehicle of origin
You still haven’t done any research into these variants, I see.
A unique one.
A unique one.
1 Like
So by that the Su-30MKI shouldn’t be a problem
2 Likes
It has no connection to the UK and there are indigenous counterparts, so no, tis very much a problem.
1 Like
But it’s a unique variant there for not C&P
2 Likes
so is a chieftain mk 5 to a mk 3 because it uses a different mark of L60 pack. your criteria for “whole different tank” is still the same fundamental tank.
Variant =/= new vehicle
[Insert my previous statement here]
1 Like
The Mk 5 is indeed not a Mk 3. It’s good that you recognise this.
No.
By your logic, the T-72A and T-90M are the exact same.
Su-30MKI is used by india, india is a British subtree so would go in that tree
2 Likes
And it shouldn’t be.
1 Like