We need more early missiles!
Especially more beam riding and MCLOS missiles.
I would love to see the K-5 (AA-1), R-4, R-8, Nord AA.25, HS 298 and Ruhrstahl X-4
5 Likes
I mean, a late 9M would be necessary for US at that point, even an early 9X. It has slightly better range than 9M, but has TVC so it burns energy faster. It’s main advantage would be the seeker which would be pretty good, but not uncounterable
An F-18E is the better carrier aircraft by far, you forget that carrier aircraft have to trade off quite a bit
We need AIR-2 rockets more
theyre the most fun missiles as theyre the most rewarding, its why i love red tops so much. far from good but arent bad either
1 Like
nah, falcons
Which would look cooler when it hits though? And do more damage
The falcon with its nuclear warhead
They put warheads on AIM-4’s? I thought it was only unguided rockets
AIM 26A, designed to take out a bomber formation with a single missile
1 Like
Need this immediately at 9.7 or 10.0
Everything thats not on there I either didn’t bother getting or would have put them in E/F tier
1 Like
the frustration when you get a “hit” with it lmao
one day the falcons will be on there
You can carry a second one right?
I dont know about the american planes but i think so
Only American planes have them though?
Nuclear wise yes, missile wise no as the swiss, swedes and finns all used the Aim 26B (conventional warhead)
3 Likes
What aircraft did they put them on? Afaik for US it was century series jets
Honestly T-33 isn’t much better in terms of copypaste, yes currently it would be unique, but it’s a plane which can be spread across multiple nations (US, Italy, China, France, Germany) in the same way as F-84s.