Id imagine these things(yamato, iowa etc) goes to 8.0. They are unironically going to face canberra and il28 etc and somehow still not worry about AA.
Now the question is, what would Italy, France, the Soviets and Germany offer to deal them? Britain could take out the vanguard and even possibly lion. Alsace would be a far strech, vittorio veneto has nothing but pen and mediocre protection at best, sovietsky soyuz is only worse, and Germany is stopping at bismarck.
Researchable Drones When?
What kind of drones? Strike UCAVs are out of question. FPVs would be a big no as well.
This one we can indeed answer right now, as we have most recently in the last few major updates added SPAAs in this era. We will always aim to fill more gaps, including SPAAs moving forward too.
No new news on this front currently.
CR2 hasn’t had any negative reductions since its overhaul. Which also had some positive improvements too.
The devs will be working though any outstanding reports on the vehicle. The main overhaul was completed however.
Hi smin, will seperate aircraft BRs for naval RB/AB be considered soon? Aircraft gameplay in naval does not offer huge significance half the time.
Su-30 early variants for soviet/russia and china coming to the first major update before Su-30SM, Su-30MKI (post Super Flanker upgrade) and Sino-Flanker ? 🤔
If F-4e Peace Icarus was added, which tree do you think it should be in? U.S. because the Phantom is a U.S. design and there’s already a greek apache in the tree? or Germany because they’re the ones who helped with the conversion and its effectively a f4f ice with guided bombs and a new cockpit? Added as a premium/event vehicle btw.
Do you maybe mean project 1047 (which I like to call "Scharnhorst’s Dutch Cousin)?
Probably the US. While yes Germany helped in the conversion it is still a US airframe, and with the precedent of a Greek AH-64A in the US TT if it was to be added then the US is where it most likely would go.
Sadly this wouldnt be something practical to offer or maintain. As you can imagine, with the sheer number of vehicles we have in games, times the number of sources per vehicle required / used (which itself can very from 10-100+ lets say depending on what), then for each system, HUD, mechanic, missile, shell and you end up with a hugely incalculable number.
Maintaining that in list form simply would not be practical. With how many people and teams working on vehicles, coupled with changes based off reports and consultant finds, it becomes clear to see why having a running list of everything ever used would not be viable sadly.
Not something planned for the foreseeable future at least.
The biggest reason I even mention Germany is because the U.S. had literally nothing to do with the conversion itself. The conversions were done based on the work done to the F-4f ICE programs specifically.
What about game data we know it’s being recorded for use in br placement so could we have access to this even if in a very raw form
Perhaps not, but the tanks it faces have only gotten significantly stronger and it’s lost it’s only major advantage in having a reload rate buff. Even tanks that were weaker like the ariete are now tentatively stronger since they got the 5 seconds reload with DM53. That was no small buff for them, but the CR2 remains the same. Especially with the ahistorically tiny ready rack.
It didn’t even get a BR reduction in the “decompression”
There are also some “outside of the box” buffs they could get like giving most of them a dozer blade.
fix keen vision
How about Python 4 and Derby on the F-16D, it already doesn’t get AMRAAMs and is 13.7 despite being a worse airframe to the F-16C, it could be bumped up to 14.0 if needed but I’m not sure it would need it, like you say IR missiles are much more restricted in usage
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.