The A-10C having IFF was intentional unless there is otherwise something to show it should not have those features. As I said, regarding F-16C, there is an open report for that.
As long as the missing weaponry doesn’t put the plane in a worse position/massively change it, or invalidate other planes, then planes should probably get it.
1 Like
I mean, they’ve implemented a double BR system so if balancing even after considering that fact is a problem then I just give up lol.
Is there any insite we could get on how choices are made for which bug reports are prioritized?
There are generally a myriad of reasons depending on type of issue, existing queue, planned model reworks and ongoing research etc. There isn’t generally a single answer to provide here really. It’s quite a complex matter.
3 Likes
tee-hee
pulled a fast one on ya
25 Likes
The report showed that the A-10C was having IFF using tactical datalink, which developers said is not yet in-game. Could you please pass the report?
1 Like
2 Likes
My bet is on the French M46 then. Literally checks those boxes.
Unless of course the trollface takes it into another league entirely lol
1 Like
Well no need to look far since this issue was fixed for Soviet/Russian aircraft soon after “Alpha Strike” came out.
There is nothing new in this report to pass. The A-10C has the features it should have and there is a suggestion open for the F-16C to receive HMD/S features. The Devs are aware of it.
That’s the problem, developers said those features do not exist in-game now (tactical datalink). The report is talking about inconsistency.
This answer was given some time ago. As I said above, the issue of what the F-16C is missing is known and there is an open suggestion on it. Comments on the A-10C were already passed at the time. There is nothing not already known in this report to pass.
The dive bomber could be the A-36 used by RAF
So probably a french sbd?
I fear that one of us is misunderstanding something.
-
The A-10C got its datalink IFF feature first before the F-16C.
-
The F-16C then had datalink IFF feature reported for it.
-
Developers responded that datalink IFF does not exist in-game (but this contradicts #1).
I completely understand that the F-16C has an open suggestion for datalink IFF for when tactical datalink arrives into the game, but this doesn’t answer why A-10C has datalink IFF when tactical datalink is not yet in the game.
Or is it a Thai SB2C?
1 Like
There for sure is no misunderstanding.
The F-16C response was posted some months ago. At the time, the OP of the report raised this and it was already forwarded back to the Devs. The report is a suggestion and was not closed and the Devs have already been made aware it exists on the A-10C.
There is therefore no need of another new report for anything here.
2 Likes
That would be incredibly disappointing, and I hope it isn’t that.
However, I do wonder what the vehicle to break the camels back for the community being against copy+paste vehicles will be.
I see a lot of any C+P sentiment, and I doubt it will get better until gaijin stops adding more.
Brit tree tank
Soviet tree bomber