Nobody post this image? Chinese leaker imply China may get a new spaa
9 Likes
1st time seeing this overlay. I dont know if its known by devs but thata definitely not how it should be.
1 Like
thanks, I’m sure they’ll fix it then at some point
My 7800xt can.
I like that its only countries that dont need spaa that get it.
1 Like
modern luchs was added what about grandpa luchs
11 Likes
Hopefully soon
1 Like
My singular prayer for this update, is that Israel’s top tier AA drought finally comes to an end.
Thought of using Chaparral against Su34’s until March and beyond makes me want to cry.
1 Like
And it begins :) the tears of ground rb top tier enjoyers
Luchs when it was cool
1 Like
tiny grandpa
These particular tears were flowing long before Su-34, and they will continue long after.
Chaparral is useless against everything. Another KH38 slinger is just the icing on the cake.
1 Like
Yeah i know.
They are talking about the datamined model.
though the mike guy and the Chinese users in the picture made a mistake. It’s FB-10 missile, not FB-10A, which is 10km range(FB-10A has bigger booster and 17km range) and only used by this early version of FB-10A SPAA.
don’t be so mean, TOR is fine but not that gine, the only one don’t need a new SPAA is USSR, and FB-10 can’t and shouldn’t be top SPAA.
Anyone having trouble with the server?
many reports about this, but I’m still fine, suffering spading SU-24
You know what’s funny ?
We can legit talk about the Hornet’s again : D lol
1 Like
Chinese TT really should’ve gotten the HQ-17, wonder if they ever plan to add it.
props againts cold-war, modern vehicles. Cool but maybe i would like to have different map for older vehicles.
IDK, but I don’t think it’s a suitable choice. In longer range, missile’s speed matters more, while HQ-17 is basiclly a improved TOR with 15km range, it’s thrust should be about 12km, very long, but enemy still have plenty of time for esscaping