Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Better be an Israeli SPAA in these lists istg, i’m on the verge of a mental breakdown.

3 Likes

Simply don’t play Israel.

Fair enough.

The dream of having more Hornets in the british tree than in the US tree?

2 Likes

Having my historical vehicles getting curbstomped by some semi real - semi paper doodle isn’t fun to me.

If i wanted that experience, i’d go play World Of Fantasymobiles.

In great wisdom, the gajin will give a new CAS for large countries and ignore the lack of adequate SPAA defense for small countries.

2 Likes

last I checked prototypes aren’t “what-ifs” after all they were built(just not put into service or finished due to other reasons)

So I’ll take that statement as “don’t want what if = don’t want prototypes”. There goes all possible uniqueness at the top tier/post-Cold War. (and about 60% of all unique vehicles in existence, congratulations on your support for C&P)

1 Like

It was an incomplete prototype, so real in Gaijins and WTs terms

1 Like

Won’t ever happen but a man can dream. They would be worse than the American ones though sadly. :(

We truly need more Magachs, Merkavas, Panzer IVs, Leopards, Abrams, Shermans, Bf 109s, Spitfires, etc

B78:
image

105GSR:

CCV:
image

5 Likes

I’d take more Shermans.

gaijin has stated the prototype had to be in a functioning state and need to be fully ensembled, as far as I am aware the OI was never in that state

I want the OH-1 as well. I personally don’t really care about the lack of ground armament. I’d love to act as a guardian with the Type 91 Kai missiles

3 Likes

I am okay with functional, complete prototypes if they are a necessity, but I draw the line at :

  • Things that were never complete / never functional.
  • Imports that were never obtained beyond a trial.

Depressingly real.

I don’t remember them ever saying that. Even more so because of the ability to suggest unfished prototypes.

Which means they are at least considered to be added. The OI is the example as it was passed to the Devs, so it is fully possible to be added, as it has been sent for them to consider.

2 Likes

Stupid question, how can something incomplete be functional? In addition, there are a lot of planes in the game that have never had weapons installed, so the lack of turrets is not a problem in O-I

4 Likes

im assuming based on the length and that its in the naval section that 3rd one is most likely A. a trophy ship or B. a ship sold to another country and under a new name

If that is true, they really should edit this part of the suggestion rules…

5 Likes