It was more of an extension to what I said rather than a reply to what I said, but yeah. I do find myself doing that a lot
1 Like
We do spend like half of our internet time on an internet forum for weapons of war, because its fucking cool.
“I used to be scyzophrenic, but now we’re going better.”
2 Likes
It has flares so works for me.
1 Like
I dont entirely agree with that. Not everything exported is used internally. Goes back to the KF-41 debate.
but in instances where both nations need something (I.e a good IFV with ATGMs) then maybe both should get that addition at the same time where possible. If its not possible. Then well… not a lot you can do about that unfortunately.
There none, unless you count this improvised mounting.
Is that Wargame?
On the KF-41 (i never talked about that), i think Germany should have one too.
An improvised mouting is a mouting anyway.
Shit you gonna make me launch WRD or Warno just for building decks.
2 Likes
I’d say both, i don’t agree that nations should be penalised for not being the manufacturer.
I think generally major things should be given to both nations.
I’m really tired and this conversation particularly requires too much thought, so sorry this makes little sense.
Y e s
They could get one, or is getting a better equipped PUMA that they do actually use in service better?
Its a tough call. If a nation has no alternative at that BR sure, but if they do have something else, in service for that BR, then they should get that instead.
If Germany had no 10/10.3 IFV then yes KF-41 should have gone there, and maybe some day it still can. But it didnt need to go there first or even in the same update.
Depend if its needed for gap or not.
I still thing nation should bring originality.
Whats the point to grind X nation if you can play X and Y stuff in another?
And if a nation only rely in majority on copy pasta, then this nation should have not be added in the game.
1 Like
You do know that game gets a lot wrong?
I would not like to grind the French props without the seafire and US superprops.
Nor would i like to grind british air without the gripen.
I think copy-paste is just how it is, it fills gaps and leads to overall more fun.
Anyway, bed time. Maybe tomorrow i can form more thought-out sentences.
There’s more French props possible to come, even a superprops that was still worked on under German supervision, even if started under French control (dont remember the name rn)
But since we don’t get props since years, i don’t think it’s something to come, saddly. Wish French props TT was more fun/filled
Goodnight
4:27am here, should go too but hard xD
2 Likes
Yes, but is still fun. Well, nowadays i prefer games of the style of “Panzer Campaigns”.
EDIT: DOBVLEG TOMORROW?
1 Like
Thinking bout Tigershark with 120s as premium aren’t ya
1 Like
I don’t think it is a good idea to put Hungarian c&p outside of the dedicated line, Italian bombers line can still be filled with planes used by Italy, especially since there is a whole family of Aermacchi jets missing, which can either go to bombers line or to strike aircraft line with reallocation of some already presented jets, such as in my custom TT.
Spoiler
PS I don’t lose my hope to see some Romanian planes in-between Hungarian line…hell, at least if comes alone, give it some modifications which aren’t in the game yet like MiG-23UB and MiG-29B, not just full copypaste.
Anyway I would exchange the entire Hungarian air line to just a single 2A7HU, it’s way more needed for the tree now.
1 Like
Eh- it uses a lot of Alt-History liberties.
But it’s on of the few military games that recognize Canada is more than 6 troops attached to UK/USA. So it gets bonus points from me.
2 Likes