Cannon → sounds French
my apologies
The major issue with C&P is the undermining of the nation that provides the equipment. You are being hard countered by your own equipment, with no compensation, and often improved variants.
The solution is the elimination of trees all together. You can research and spawn in anything you want.
UK, HMS X1
Laughs in 4 5.2 inch guns AND 6 torp tubes
They made a movie with a slightly modified surcouf look-like sub if that’s what you are talking about.
They also made big carrier-sub, there were the biggest sub in ww2 from 1942, but before that it was the Surcouf who holded the record ^^
It was actually quite a common idea, though it was primarily the IJN which used them in service:
I don’t think so, it 's first construction came relatively close to completion and most of the aircraft it would have operated( Bf 109T-1, Fi 167 ) entered service despite it. The only really large question abt it is if it would also be provided w/ the folding wing/arrestor hook Stuka variant that was never finished.
Japanese Submarine Type I-25
It bombed Oregon twice
im sorry, that’s a terrible argument
this is a game, not Real life, if you fail against the very tank you’re playing then idk if you were worth winning that fight
like come on, if you fight the same tanks you got in your lineup you should really know the weak spots
1 Like
No, that is a terrible argument. If the team you’re facing can directly counter you with the same damn vehicle, and have vehicles with different capabilities, you are at a disadvantage.
I’m not talking about 3 torps tubs but 3 sets of torp.
4 tubes of heavy 550mm (22") in the front.
2x triple external torps with each : 1x 550 and 2x 400 (16")mm
So technically 10 torps tubes if you want to count like that :p
And turret with 2x 8 inch gun :p
are you mad that you’re not always at an unfair advantage?
I mean, there are tanks that actually can’t fight themselves properly, like Matilda, certain Churchills and similar Heavies, but otherwise yeah, meeting some of your own tanks shouldn’t be a problem
1 Like
I’ll agree it would be passing the limits and would only be 100% useful where naval as both subs and cold war. It’s got a few weapons that could be used in GRB but not much. Hence it only be viable in a Canadian TT as the ASW planes kinda take over the post-WW2 bomber line.
I just want it because funny armed passenger plane. (along with others like it)
1 Like
Again: the point isn’t that copy paste is desired, the point is that it isn’t bad when used for filling gaps.
Unique stuff is and always will be strived for before copy paste, not sure why this needs to be said.
1 Like
Yes but that just means you can only get up to 4 torps on target at once, lol
Whilst this thing has almost all of the armament facing forwards
Who needs to aim backwards when you are on the offensive, hmm?
(/s btw)
None. Officially it doesn’t exist yet, but we know it’s coming thanks to the leak list, and it’s engine being datamined
1 Like
What are you even talking about? How is not constantly fighting your own vehicles an unfair advantage? Does the UK have a massive advantage because few of its vehicles are in other trees.
1 Like
yea but like those are almost nation exclusive
the german Premium Churchill and the Soviet Event Matilda (which is unique btw.) aren’t your every day enemies
2 Likes
I think it inflicted a casualty of one single civilian. Still, the Japanese ballons - zero.
I agree, C&P is necessary for filling gaps. The issue is those demanding C&P want to protect their own vehicles from being C&P’d in other trees, despite the trees having gaps that need filled.
4torps in the front, and 2 x 3 torps on 2 other target.
3 target at once for torps.
Yeah, i wonder ! :p
1 Like