Could it get access to the SAM system with a deployable ammo carrier(?M1050?)? (e.g. M992 to go with the M109 would also be interesting instead of an ammo box for resupply) There would have been some way to cart around ammo for it outside the vehicle, I doubt crewmen were rucking with 8" shells behind the vehicle for any distance.
1 Like
Drag is a coefficient dependent on the shape of the missile. It’s however not dependant on the size of said missile. The caliber is going to be the important factor here
Yes it ran with an M548 ammo carrier, which could carry about 24 rounds for the M110.
Here’s a good video on it.
M110
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TUs6q1VjauE
Note, the M548 does have a .50 cal on it, so on top of having Proxy M106, it could also use the .50 as anti air.
I just noticed the Buk missiles have a trigger radius of 25 meters. 💀 I don’t think multipath will help against that + 50kg explosive.
Honestly with the B-66 being a rank VI bomber and being 9.0, its completly dead on arrival thanks forces ground spawn, F-84F’s with air spawn, F-104’s with Napalm, Harriers with Napalm, and missiles being very common alongside higher G pull ones like R60 and Aim-9J/P. Needs to at leaat be moved to rank V in order to actually have a semblence of usability
1 Like
Russia number 1 Слава России
Lol. I’m not even against adding very good SPAAs but can gaijin please think of the other nations who don’t even have usable SPAA
1 Like
As an Italian main, I’m absolutely grateful for the SAMP/T. The second nation I main, Japan, is really behind now tho, it was obsolote the minute it came out.
Yeah it looks like it’s going to be in a very poor state. Doubt you will manage to get even halfway across the map without being killed by an R-60 slinger or something like a AIM-9D/G unless you scrape the edge of the map at which point all the bases are gone or the match has ended.
1 Like
Gaijin once again showing their abaolute contempt for bombers
1 Like
Surprised they even gave it a modelled cockpit tbh.
2 Likes
M55 is already one BR lower than it should.
giving it proxy fuse would make it shoot down planes by aiming where they were a minute ago.
1 Like
M55 however takes a long time to reload, the shell has rather low velocity, and doesnt have full turret traverse
A subsonic aircraft with poor maneuverability, no countermeasures and RWR? Not a funny joke.
Well the people playin the Gr.1 better make sure not to stomp too hard in it then.
Was making a joke about the snail doing that to it before and i wouldn’t be suprised id they do it again
Shudders when remembering the Hunter F6 was once 10.3
Again, sraam is better than it was before it could happen. But tbf the vehicles around the harriers have greatly changed
Yeah, that was back before all-aspects were In game I think.
I think SRAAMs vs CMs is a fair trade for the Harrier GR1 and I cant see it moving.
Hunter F6 though… If we apply the same logic, could end up at 10.0 alongside the Hunter F58.
Hopefully the lack of CMs and being subsonic caps it at 9.7 for now.
Though if we ever get a decompression. They’ll definetly be higher than most.
Assuming of course these SRAAMs make it to live. Wouldnt be first time an awesome buff was dev-server exclusive
So then raise it in BR? I don’t see the issue with giving it proxy, which it could use, and raising it in BR.