It’s literally the same person again, we can only have a break if they were on a forced holiday ; )
yall must argue about N011M scan speed
You mean a ban?
1 Like
I’m personally going to use confirmation bias to believe that it’s premium packs for submarine Closed Beta Testing.
Anything is possible with confirmation bias.
2 Likes
yeah but no joke all yall need to chill out
1 Like
Both of these ships would struggle. Against the Iowa. So how would it be fair for them to fight the Yamato? These are just two countries.
![[1600 x 1182] The battleship RN Roma rests at anchor, c. mid 1942 ...](https://i.redd.it/fo6lr5jgk1b01.jpg)
Even if they did qdd paper stuff neither france nor Italy designed anything even close to that
My guess is they will roll out some of those “3-packs” but with high tier ground vehicles, one for each major nation maybe
If the price is good I would welcome it as a way to reduce one death leaving
At the same time I’m not a big fan of tech tree vehicles being left behind and not being used as much
Either that or we dont add yamato
And also i looked through every naval tech tree
This is the only US class that is in a tech tree without a US one
1 Like
That would be funny, but part of me thinks this could be relating the Hornet.
Or maybe we just stop with the fantasy land and accept the fact the US didn’t build the montana
Hmmmm, 16:13 here already… no dov bleg? :(
never said it was OK either. i dont support that addition.
Giving one nation a OP vehicle which will flood toptier is more fantasy land idea
so then they should model nearly instant ranging of Iowa class right? and superior fire control & radar
The problem is they don’t model those things. So Yamato having horrible accuracy in real life? Will not be modeled in.
I’m sure i’ll be fine on that front
2 Likes
Isnt that literally what you’re asking for with the nuke shell idea
1 Like