Honestly I think the D/F would be better being foldered with their single seat versions. The two seats are pretty much the same aircraft except for a bit worse performance.
Unless there’s a major difference like between the F-15C and F-15E I think any two seat aircraft like the F/A-18D/F and stuff like the F-16D should be foldered with their single seat versions
gib hummel
And there’s are typically more Americans than those any other country on English speaking forums.
T92 HMC please
Ditto.
It’s be neat to see given how a majority of them would be lower than the already ingame stuff, and perform pretty well at that AFAIK.
While they’re at it, T93 GMC.
Or the Queen Elizabeth, I prefer ramped carriers anyways, like the Kuznetsov is also really cool, though that is classified as a Heavy Aviation Cruiser, and carries 12 Granit anti-ship missiles, so that it can transmit the Bosphorus
Nice find !
They look kind of similar to the ones that have been featured in some cinematics, though tbf there 's only so many ways to do accurate deck crew uniforms.
HMS Implacable(R86) was discovered in Mobile 's files, similarl to how Illustrious was before it came to WT.
why not M110 or M43 HMC?
I think the WW2 one might do a bit better, due to having AP shells, allowing them to front-line fight without issue.
At least the 25-pdr did iirc. But I’m going to assume most others would as well from the time.
Honestly the Brits have a pretty strong presence here, and Canadians (unless you’re including them with the Americans)
ohh a comrade, que onda pa?
nah, CVN better
also QE is way newer than Enterprise, and that does seem to matter for WT carriers.
AEGIS is dropping all 12 granits lol
yeah and me too haha
American 155mm ones used same M107 shell as T30 ingame afaik, so they should be pretty good.
I believe USA had 105mm HEAT/HE shells? Don’t know about AP, but it’s a possibility.
Also pretty good choices :D
If you dont mind me asking why does an ai controlled carrier have to be worse or better?
bigger landing area and better launching on any CVN than a QE
I mean we are talking about 2 different BRs. Verdi-2 would be at 10.0-11.0 area. Ajax would be 11.3+. Ajax has alot of variants to, the standard variant wont be good in top tier without missiles. Sure some people saying its getting 2 ATGMs but not seen anything else apart from people saying it. There’s the overwatch variant which has 6 brimstones but its going to become to late eventually to add the Ajax, i mean the PUMA and and Swedish IFVs are already out there doing the job the ajax is doing.
3 203mm and a 240 lol
not sure why it would, as much as I love my QE, it’s no Nimitz
Right so designed for different purposes to handle completely different kind of aircraft, that doesn’t make anything specifically better or worse tbh, both do what they are designed for