…To be fair, given they’re casemate, probably have no gun depression, and would have a long reload+open top, they could probably be put pretty low :D
Don’t forget about the Yeramba. Which is basically a uoʇxǝS.
a CVN would be objectively better than a QE ingame, i have nothing against it its a cool carrier, but a CVN would be easier to
- take off from
- land from
- you could even spawn 2 ppl on one comfortably (angled flight deck)
what about the Kondensator and Oka lol
I reiterate, why does it need to be “better” last i checked no one mentioned better or worse
I mean, that’s technically post war.
Even if it’s just a Sexton built by the Aussies in the 1950s.
Verdi-2 would be 10.7 at least considering that the Stormer HVM is 10.3.
If the Ajax was added without missiles it would likely be 10.7, based on BRs of the PUMA, Namer, Strf 9040c, etc. It would be hard to say where an Ajax with missiles would go, but it most likely wouldn’t be higher than 11.3.
Edit: Actually, if the CTA 40 was enough to push the Ajax to 11.3+, the Verdi-2 would be 11.0 at the very least as well.
Not sure why you think we shouldn’t get the QE then?
South American.
carrier defensive armaments are a thing too.
Edit: NVM, even though it is quite new it seems it only has autocannons and machine guns, so could be added immediately
Then you’ve nothing to worry about, the QE only has 3 Phalanx CIWS for air defense
That was me asking you why you’re making yhe better or worse comparison, the same thingnive asked you twice
Also speaking of carrier defensive armament, the Kuznetsov has both of us beat by a country mile I’d say, and that’s already in game
looks like Enterprise and Nimitz had sea sparrows (they kinda suck, but still) as well as CIWS
true, no reason to not add all 3 types then
And the Charles de Gaulle while we’re at it
Depends on whether they’re early or late sea sparrows. Later ones only share a general form, and are basically an entirely different much better missile system IIRC
Enterprise is 1960’s carrier, probably early sea sparrows
The J-10B is equipped with PESA radar, due to AESA not being completed as expected, it is temporarily replaced by PESA. The batch produced after AESA is completed and put into operation is named J-10C. J-10B only serves as a bridge between A and C