So China shouldn’t be in China, but Ukraine should be in the USSR?
1 Like
im kinda surpised we didnt get a early model F/A-18A before BVRAAM’s
2 Likes
Yes. Hence my comments about how nation based trees are incoherent nonsense for the modern era.
Lol
I’m not arguing for Ukraine to be added. I don’t think Ukraine adds any value to the game. My point is, if Ukraine can’t be added to the same tree as Russia due to the on going conflict, ROC never should have been added to the same tree as the PRC.
That context helps, it’s complicated but I agree for the most part.
Ukraine is a strange topic though, as they obviously bring a lot of NATO equipment along with any domestic production.
thaaaats not true, ukraine has many seriously many unique heavy modification for vehicles , even before the current ongoing thing. Best example T-84 oplot which thankfully will come with thai sub tree in japan
2 Likes
ukraine yes, but without any donated vehicles in my opinion
vilkas isn’t in the USSR tree either, despite the baltics being part of the USSR
Austrian vehicles aren’t in the german tree despite they being part of nazi germany (which is in game due to the ww2 flag)
These vehicles are were they fit best
1 Like
I do think it’s a bit strange too…but that just means we’ll get to jump to an 18 with 120’s off the bat 😃
1 Like
to be fair, that was the plan originaly, the french just were very very angry
1 Like
As we should.
2 Likes
Money
Chinese mains can try growing up a little. Theyre gonna get an abrams, why cant other countries get vt4?
Why would French mains be angry about Austrian vehicles going to Germany? The double standards blow my mind.
A handful of unique models don’t justify adding Ukraine as a stand alone tree.
i mean , sweden is a thing, they arent better
Sweden has low tier, Ukraine does not, unless you count copy paste soviet vehicles
It was a French vehicle.
1 Like
Because Austria used the AMX-13 FL-15 to make the SK-105.
1 Like