I was just making a guess, so I could be wrong. I don’t know the exact values.
1 Like
I am aware.
1 Like
damn they seem to be missing quite a lot of penetration ingame
These are LOS values, not 0º ones, though, I believe!
I am going to run a Lanz-Odermatt that gives the values in 0º 0m values.
Stand by!
1 Like
It’s done at NATO standard angle… which is 60 degrees.
Besides I noticed it uses wrong velocity values hahah
I am remaking it manually
ah ok
How strange… I am getting lower values for 3BM60 than Gaijin’s.
That means Gaijin uses a different parameter for some metric. Either higher density, or whatever.
EDIT: screw it, this is confusing, xD.
Regardless, it always appears like 3BM59 is indeed a marginal improvement over 3BM60.
1 Like
Why am I not surprised even slightly :D
4 Likes
Your reverse psychology tricks wont work on me this time, silly.
I am probably using wrong parameters hahahah
I was getting 525mm at 0º, but that seems too low xD
Man I’m really fiending for an aim120 rn…
2 Likes
Gaijin + soviet tanks. you never know. Though youd think theyd have been called out for it by now.
Cause the math is hard to learn, and the average forum user will have difficulties learning it.
Spanish may get there with enough practice.
APFSDS isn’t exclusive to the Soviets…
They are either gunna be hilarously fun and redfine the meta or a total flop and rarely worth equipping. I dont think they will be anywhere between those to extremes
But yes, I want them too
I’m fully expecting the later sadly but I will spam them anyway.
Yeah, not a lot of choice for the FA2 :D
(though why do I get the feeling it will still get skyflash)
Thank you professor for your little nuggets of wisdom.
Theyre like little bird shits of enlightenment colliding with the honda civic windscreen of life.