You do realize that most of us don’t really care that much about C&P or to be more specific, C&P Vehicle that makes somewhat or absolutely makes sense to be added for them and doesn’t fall in the double standard type.
Also like ShadowFang said earlier, No one is forcing you to play the BeNeLux stuff, you can just pretend it doesn’t exist in France.
Well, at least for urban maps which IFVs do fine there isnt an urban map that goes on for miles.
BeNeLux
NF-5A - C&P Standard F-5, right?
Mirage 5BA - C&P Mirage 5?
F-16A is an F-16A. Why is there two of them though?
Leopard 1 Cockerill 3105 - Modernised Leopard 1, new turret, capabilities, cool!
2A4 NL
2A6 NL
Both C&P?
What if Kei Truck but SAM
Warthundern’t
I’d legitimately take a premium Vextra over a premium Dutch Leopard.
WHOLE OF FRANCE RANK 4 AIR IS C&P.
Like come on France isn’t the cleanest nation stop being salty
What are you taking from. my messages? Was I rude? Did I use any specific language?
Why are you getting agitated? I literally just posted what they seem like to me and asked whether or not my assessment is wrong
No you don’t get it, it’s not copy paste because it has… umm… a refueling probe (or something…)!
I also said migs since that the main thing their air line has past ww2
Dutch has F-16A MLUs capable of firing AMRAAM and AIM-9M, Belgian only has up to the F-16A OCU, so it makes some sense.
Just because copy and paste exists doesn’t mean we should accept or encourage more copy paste though.
the Mirage 5BA I believe is a domestic Belgian variant I think
Well yeah because those are the vehicles the germans operated, they aren’t from a subtree.
WE NEED MORE COPY AND PASTE
This is a sentence
Somewhat-ish…? Idk much about it but from what I was told it just a F-5 that can turn even more tighter Unless I’m wrong.
there might be something interesting for it loadouts.
Idk it I don’t think France really needs F-16 at all. but that just my opinion on it
pretty much by the looks of it but eh… It was bound to happen anyway :P
Thank you, I didnt know the differences
Puma is far ahead in mobility and capabilities as an IFV than the namer lol due to it being smaller and more mobile.
Your assessment isn’t wrong lol Most, minus the Leopard 1, will be vehicles we’ll already be familiar with.
ok India Mig-27ML WHEN
Yep, C-5 equivalent in range, but a bit faster and likely a bit more agile, at the cost of being limited to 4 rather than the 8 AMRAAMs that can be carried.
They can also not be used together with AMRAAMs from what I understand, so it’ll always be a choice between more or better missiles.
Though they also are stated to be hidden from RWR, so if that is implemented the higher weight per missile and lower missile count might be well worth it.