Yep
I’m fine with them being in other tree, tbh you would be hard-pressed to find a nation that wants the challenger 2 or Chieftain, also not to mention like no nations use them so there arent really options for nations to get them outside of say trials like a greek challenger 2
1 Like
You know what, that’s a good point. I guess whoever picks the names at GJHQ just prefers air?
I don’t mind since I’ve given up on ground, so air named updates don’t bother me anymore.
Wait, but some updates have been specifically ground name oriented, right?
are you OK? Do you play Naval now?
I mean, Warthunder used to just be air.
More
1 Like
We want Ukrainian challengers to be added to the soviet TT. Maybe it means we can get them to a playable state
3 Likes
real lol, or they will be a lower br for some reason lol
I just play air and naval. I find it a lot more enjoyable.
2 Likes
Still no mention of BR separation between air and naval.
1 Like
the amount of malding about the new su27 is funny lol.
2 Likes
“omg new best attacker!!!1!1!1!1”
>the f16c that was the best till now
Well… They just confirmed that BRs have no real meaning.
Despite acknowledging the tornados are identical.they aren’t getting the same BR
I’m using convertible RP. I’m getting sick of the MiG-23-ML and I don’t care anymore. Thankfully I’m almost at the Su-27 so the SM should be the only thing I have to buy.
honestly f16c will probably still be better overall.
1 Like
honestly only change I care about
8 Likes
Yeah, that is a relief
I love how for the USA and Russian ~10br strikes planes it sound like “they sell a lot and populate nicely those BR so we are not gonna nerf them because we would lose money.”
What’s wrong with the new Su-27? :/ Or am I missing something here?