But as the creator of the video said, MICA and R-77s were the two missiles most likely to benefit from the bugs being fixed. R-77 had extreme wobbliness which drained its energy. So R-77 stands to be better relative to the PL-12 next patch.
Or it’s wanted as it is for balance MICAs
It doesn’t? You know that different jets use different flight computers and different weapon management systems right?
Most likely will be come in the future or could be first one we will recieve.
R-73 is mad, Sraam is mad, MICA is mad. What do they have in common?
pl12 can compare to the aim120c inreality, but in this game it is worse than r77 lol
no idea all I know is the R-darter was the tied worst with derby and since it was never actually mounted on the JAS39C its gonna be imposable to get them to fix it or give us a better missile
It entered service, 3 were built, but immeidately handed over to the canadian, served as HMCS Ontario for like 20 years
2 Likes
It’ll still be heavily relying on spikes, which are inconsistent at best.
It’s 30mm will be awkward to use on a chassis as large and less mobile than the Mk.4 Merkavas.
feels like what’s happening in my pants right now regarding the patch lol
4 Likes
Flight computers and weapon management systems on Kurnass2K should be allow you to equip different armaments at the same time, if you have documents that shows this is not the case then feel free the share cause i couldnt find single one that states its not possible.
mope, iirc they were in service, not sure in what form
oh wait we are talking about very different ships
How are the aam4s going to compare to the other fox 3s? (Edit: didn’t mean to reply to this)
the Merkava Mk.4s are more mobile then you think, especially with the turret largely gone (it’s still there just much smaller)
It is what it is tbh.
Oh right :D Im talking about the Minotaur-class light cruiser
1 Like
sir i regrettably was comparing boats, not a clue
? No…
AAM-4 is just an AIM-120C equivalent missile at the end of the day.
AAM-4B adds a different radar.