no idea all I know is the R-darter was the tied worst with derby and since it was never actually mounted on the JAS39C its gonna be imposable to get them to fix it or give us a better missile
It entered service, 3 were built, but immeidately handed over to the canadian, served as HMCS Ontario for like 20 years
2 Likes
It’ll still be heavily relying on spikes, which are inconsistent at best.
It’s 30mm will be awkward to use on a chassis as large and less mobile than the Mk.4 Merkavas.
feels like what’s happening in my pants right now regarding the patch lol
4 Likes
Flight computers and weapon management systems on Kurnass2K should be allow you to equip different armaments at the same time, if you have documents that shows this is not the case then feel free the share cause i couldnt find single one that states its not possible.
mope, iirc they were in service, not sure in what form
oh wait we are talking about very different ships
How are the aam4s going to compare to the other fox 3s? (Edit: didn’t mean to reply to this)
the Merkava Mk.4s are more mobile then you think, especially with the turret largely gone (it’s still there just much smaller)
It is what it is tbh.
Oh right :D Im talking about the Minotaur-class light cruiser
1 Like
sir i regrettably was comparing boats, not a clue
? No…
AAM-4 is just an AIM-120C equivalent missile at the end of the day.
AAM-4B adds a different radar.
Didn’t mean to respond to that lol
1 Like
did u mean the WoWs format with 5x2 152mm Autoloaders?
And PL-12 is supposed to be an AIM-120C equivalent missile, look at how that turned out.
As far as i know Namer uses less powerful engine (something 1200hp iirc?).
If that is still the case then it will be par or slightly worse then Merkava 4.
1 Like
Ah… Right yeah that thing. Would be funny.
Not sure what the rules are on paper ships when it comes to naval. I think there is more wiggle room that there is for tanks or air