If it actually has worse accuracy than Belfast I’ll need to offer my condolences to the braincells of whichever person was responsible for that
“I know! A cruiser that was built 10 years later will have worse accuracy than a WW2 Cruiser!”
Other jets can also do that, except Kurnass for some reason
Right. It’ll be a never ending daisy chain of “the next typhoon will totally be super op and better than everything” only for it to never be true lmao
I should’ve thought about that one.
Unable because of electronics from F-15A
fair enough, thanks for informing me of this!
1 Like
the PL-12 had very different stats to the R77 and I think was on par if not better in the test server
Thank you
which bit to never be true?
Most likely :D
If they fix armor values, add 30MM version with SPIKES then it will be really good machine.
There’s still an ARH page on the missile spreadsheet if you want to double check things
Edit: no idea if it’s been changed since dev tho
It wasn’t better and was worse in realistic situations such as 40km bvr and close range manueverability. Worse in both categories.
I am surprised we’ve not got it yet
tbf missiles were pretty buggy (mica just spinning for some reason comes to mind) so it will probably be changed on the live server
Guess I was right about the aam4s
What’s a minitour?
Thrust vectoring code is cursed
1 Like
the IFV version with Trophy and a fully fledged turret would be the nicest, but I’ll settle with the skeletal RCWS-30 version with spikes
MiG 21 for Britain
1 Like
I was firing at a destroyer the other day about 4km away, and at least 1-2 shells of every salvo (each salvo is only 4 shells) were missing by miles due to shell dispersal. Belfast has pinpoint accuracy in comparison. In the Tiger, you just dont fire at anything at like 10km. Just no point wasting shells, 1 might hit per salvo if you are lucky. Meanwhile something like Helana has double your rounds per min and you will die fast
1 Like
Canadian mig 21 as an aptil fools joke would be silly
1 Like