Well its a better T80U but worse then the BVM so i can see it being the 11.3 premium for russia
2 Likes
I could see it happen too, I just don’t think it should happen.
Take the VT-4A1 for example. Worse than the base T-80U already except for gen2 thermals and a bit better vertical speed. Still 11.7 because of a gimicky APS that doesn’t even work half the time.
3 Likes
I don’t think it would be that bad
1 Like
It wouldn’t be too bad if all the other 11.7 tanks were either fixed, moved to 11.3 (as they are on par or worse than said UE-1) or both.
2 Likes
Cr2 might get some fixes
Cr1 might get gen 2 thermals
1 Like
Britain will grow larger.
3 Likes
Just like the VIckers Mk 7 and TIALD pod
1 Like
Yes it due to the Cr1 having the same thermals as the Cr2 which are gen 2
Or rather due to how SPRITE works
when did the Brits get Chromium?
what
More important question is why do Americans need to change the name from an already well known item with a stupid name.
Ok, maybe they have a point…
I’d much rather have this one!
From the timeline of events, what I understand is:
- “Orange” guy does his leak, with any corrections (mentioned a bit below)
- Chinese guy does his leak
- “Orange” guy is presumed to have only the model information and not the actual filenames so assumes the model they saw is not the F-2 and that the Chinese guy made a mistake since you could easily confuse the F-16 and F-2.
Of course, the “orange” guy could be mistaken too. It’s his best guess too. Not sure if there’s any more info on the matter since then.
I think the F-20 one was the “orange” guy not realizing the F-20 and the Tiger Shark were the same thing, but they later corrected that F-20 is indeed coming.
(Does this orange guy have a name cause I feel bad referring to them as such lol)
Aside from all that, the interesting thing I’ve noted is a lot of these leaks have F-2 and Type 90 premium and quote “russian CC” sources. This was also the same thing the Chinese guy showed by a screenshot of fake Olivia (the russian CC source that is). Which is making me think there’s some credibility? Or everyone is just copying the Chinese leaker stuff and putting their own spin on it.
6 Likes
I see cheers for this m8.
As I said weeks back mistaking the F-2 with an F-16 is so easy to make.
But my question is now will it be another fake or from another country maybe Thailand or Korea.
1 Like
they have to come up with more planes cuz rn is just a copy paste for every country
like i got Baz, but why should i have the american f15
Copied over from the off topic thread
Spoiler
But yea in my view the C&P argument is invalid as it’s more emotional tool and so wishy washy what is atcually considered C&P.
Like I’ve said above everyone will have their own views on C&P but most of them will just use it to make a point in a argument without atcually knowing fully what C&P means.
If people think the Firefly is C&P then we most consider the American P-51 C&P as it was made for the British calling.
Calling variants C&P even with big differences is just nit picking because you don’t like it.
So yea if anyone want’s my views or if people want to use this for their sound C&P argument then please do so but give credit.
2 Likes
But I am right yk? My Baz is better than the American one tho it is a copy, so why should I also grind US Air TT