Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

You really don’t know how marketing works do you

1 Like

India just tl me wouldnt draw that much of a crowd tbh

  1. I was not specifically referring to India, and 2. have a cheeky geez at this dole bludger.

You cannot know that.

Have you asked the whole country of India ?

1 Like

Gaijin pls
image

4 Likes

I can tell due to the fact on this forum it isn’t nearly as large or as invested as the other tree suggestions

So, in other words, you’re pulling stuff out of your arse and calling it gold.

1 Like

Lol 😂

Honestly think india is a major war thunder population compared with eastern and western player bases…

Ngl India vs China is going to be spicy as hell though

1 Like

Agree with you. I already said before that during the last few years Gaijin deliberately tried to discourage German players and attract them to other trees (Sweden, Italy).

However, during these last two years (exactly since the pandemic) the player base increased considerably and demand became more evident on different social networks in the WT world. Gaijin brought some dignity back to the German air tree with the mig23, 29 and tornado. However, I return to the central point of our concern, there are not too many options left.

I am against vehicles that were only evaluated. Maybe I would put the F-20 and nothing else. You cannot fall into the logic of adding evaluated vehicles because it is more dangerous than playing Russian roulette. Argentina evaluated a dozen airplanes in the last decade alone. Imagine how many aircraft Germany has evaluated in its history. I’m going to think that Swedish vehicles are a very rare exception and not the norm.

I leave you a small question for you to reflect on (you don’t need to answer): what do you think Gaijin would do if he decided that Germany needed an F-18?

a) You think gaijin would put an F-18 evaluated by Germany.

b) Or you think gaijin would put a Swiss F-18 in the German TT.

I’m in favour of trialled vehicles as they represent how a nation could have gone.

However, I think they should be event vehicles. Not tech, premium or squad.

1 Like

What Gaijin will/wants to do is irrelevant, since I am talking about what Gaijin should do.

I am convinced that gaijin tried this, discouraging German demand and increasing supply in lesser nations like Sweden and Italy.

However, while the Swedish tree has gained more popularity and eventually the Italian one is doing so, both are far from being as massive as the Big 3. Germany will continue to be a magnet for new players as long as it has WWII vehicles.
It is very difficult to make all nations equally popular, because history cannot be erased and people want to replicate those events through a video game (this is probably the main reason why new players are attracted to the game) .

There are a billion people in India. Unfortunately, it seems that’s the audience that Gaijin wishes to attract.

1 Like

I agree, though the poor state of the LeClerc, Challenger 2 and Ariette cant be forgiven on those grounds and even though Britain may not have had a 12+ till recently. doesnt mean we couldnt have gotten something at any BR last year

4 Likes

Did you even read trough the suggestion?
It specialy csme into suggestion because of germanys lack of CAS and top tier gen 4 fox 3 carrier

Why does adding one or two vehicle necessitate the restructuring of an entire tree?

Really what you think is irrelevant (with all due respect). Here we are speculating about what gaijin would do in the future, based on what gaijin did and does currently.