I’d still take an AlphaJet over no trainer
1 Like
Apart from ofc the alpha jets the RAF did use to train with for a few years* xD
(copy paste do be ez for gaijin, British revenge for the Swiss hunter moment!)
Not rare but it was a 1,000 pond bomb that the army had no choice to detonate it.
and yea it cause a **** load of damage
Potentially great mobility if the A model gets the 670hp engine
that happens regularly here
Maybe, but would still be another British vehicle replaced by something not strictly speaking british for the sake of less workload. Would be annoying.
Need that Red Arrow Livery
not replacement just another addition
Eh… What is the likelyhood we’d get Hawk after Alpha jet?
Still waiting on our light tanks
we also got an Australian Beufighter instead of no later one at all
Though I suppose we can just get Canadian Alpha jets :P
1 Like
Oh my two Canadian things at once that will set people off
2 Likes
why Canadian ones if you have like british ones?
No armament iirc
Quick google. Britian had 12, but only 6 flew. I have no idea what htey were used for.
Canada actually operates them, including as Electronic warfare platforms.
they’re former Luftwaffe ones, they can definitely use armament
1 Like
I think gajin never add pre-order pack premium aircraft rank 8 before introduced rank 9 for aviation toptier
Sea Harrier FRS.51 early could be 2nd premium pre-order pack in rank 7 after F-4J Phantom F.3
I guess after F-4M Phantom FGR.2 (RAF) might be Indian fighter aircraft 12.3 and another fighter aircraft 12.7 & 13.0 BR at first line after JAS39C maybe fighter aircraft with active radar homing BVRAAM from Indian & SAAF before Eurofighter Typhoon FA.2
Ah fair enough then
it would be worse the indian one
worse range bvr
worse radar
worse engine
1 Like
If Sea Harrier FRS51 came without Derby ARH missiles. Then yeah, it could be a half decent 11.3 ish Premium. But Id doubt for the TT. Just wouldnt be any point. It would be a worse version of the Gr7 for A2A
I don’t know why this keeps being repeated, but AFAIK, the first leaker (orange guy as I call him) claimed the Chinese leaker made a mistake. That’s it. No other proof.
So you either believe the first guy, or trust the Chinese leaker (with good track record so far), who is known for making corrections to mistakes…
Granted, I’m very biased towards to XF-2A and F-2 early right now, but this being RR&D, I’m not going to rule it out without some confirmation from the source (or it missing from dev stream/server, whichever is first).