Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Game Discussion General Discussion
402

historical falkland FGR.2 gaming 🙏

403

so lol my point is he wasnt the only one prolonging the thread

405

caught in 4k

1 Like
406

407

I just noticed some extra weird code failures. The light tank driving around here is supposed to be a KF41 considering thats the latest light tank. However it is a centauro 120.
Where did they mess up in the codes this time?
image

1 Like
408

propably to do with it being a italian base /hangar and the KF 41 being hungarian

Maybe try to choose the Hungarian leopard or any other vehicle and the KF41 might start showing up, would be intresting

409

If you want to, you can get a custom hangar and change the driving vehicle (that’s what I did)

410

A few updates ago the KF41 was driving around and I am sure it was for all Italian vehicles, since the latest light tank gets a stroll and thats the tradition. Might just be a weird code failure but gaijin is pretty good at it still.
Yeah the centauro is still here.
image

411

I dont want a specific tank driving, it is just that I am 99% sure it was supposed to be a KF41 driving here, and the KF41 was indeed here for a decent time. Gaijin couldve just messed up the codes here and reverted it back, so who knows.

412

eh, might have to do with the KF41 being collectively hated and considered being bad and people even prefering the freccia over it

413

Yeah that makes sense, it was a freccia between la royale and sons of attila. Still no idea when this gets changed though, I am very sure the KF41 was there until IDK when and there are no forum posts that explicitly wanted the KF41 gone from the hanger driving.
I would say its just the game codes breaking down and nothing to write home about.

414

Freccia is faster, its that simple, speed = fun

415

What thr hell do you mean puma we don’t have a puma and never will (unless the give up on the Ajax but that would just lead to a CV90)

416

He means a ‘Heavy IFV’ with an unmanned mid-calibre turret. Which both Ajax and Puma fit the definition of. But you could group all BMP’s/BMD’s(?) with that sort of logic.

417

But that like going a Leo and Abrams are the same as their both 120mm smooth bore mbts

418

It has nothing to do with popularity, they change them from time to time.

  • From 2.26.0.34 (May 30, normal hangar) it’s the VBM Freccia C/C.
  • From 2.29.0.5 (Sep 12, normal hangar) it’s the KF41.
  • From 2.31.0.10 (Oct 31, halloween hangar) it’s the halloween Dodge truck.
  • From 2.31.0.17 (Nov 1, anniversary hangar) it’s the VBC Centauro PT 2.
  • From 2.31.1.29 (Nov 13, normal hangar) it’s the KF41.
  • From 2.31.1.41 (Nov 20, normal hangar) it’s the 40/70 Leopard.
  • From 2.32.0.23 (Dec 7, new year hangar) it’s the VBC Centauro PT 2.
  • From 2.33.0.4 (Dec 11, new year hangar) it’s the Centauro MGS.
  • From 2.33.0.66 (Jan 15, normal hangar) it’s the Centauro MGS.
2 Likes
419

I meant relatively. When compared to things like the Gripens and Su-27s, an F-16A with AIM-9Ms isn’t anything special.

420

Considering it will get AIM-120 together with AIM-9M it will be very good

421

Ajax isnt unmanned?

422

I explicitly said “without AMRAAMs and with AIM-9M”, but okay.

1 Like