Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

[WaretaGarasu]

I agree. Or giving to the CR3TD ahistorical upgrades like the trophy, a roof mg, spall liners on turret and blowouts until the proper cr3 comes into the game

[Mytho-GR1]

Yeah as it just missing so much stuff that the actual one would have

[Mytho-GR1]

@WaretaGarasu

until the proper cr3 comes into the game

it would make it functionally a CR3 anyway

[WaretaGarasu]

Well, yeah

[somebody_Else]

The engine is correct.

[oom1992]

@Mytho-GR1

well they denied f/a18s sadly

@Mytho-GR1

doubt it

@Smin1080p

The F-18 is not an aircraft coming soon

Is there any possibility that early legacy hornet with SARH MRAAM AIM-7 coming to Q2 or Q3 ?

[LorentzManifolds]

Proof? By the time Obj. 292 went to trials (1990-1991), the GTD-1250 was already in use on the T-80U (1985).

[Mytho-GR1]

properly not it will be a while

[StormRyder13]

Honestly, with Gaijin’s plans, it’s looking like the 80s Hoernt will just be skipped right now.

[oom1992]

@Mytho-GR1

no clue maybe missile count but im not sure it flight performance would be similar to what is in game

@Fireraid233

I believe flight performance at least on the A version would be similar if not worse then what we already have in game…and they used sparrows so not really sure why they are holding them back.

@Texas_Engineer_Mike

A would be comparable (or slightly worse) to F-14A but that’s with clean config. Loaded F/A-18A would have terrible performance. C would be much better thanks to stronger engines. Tho still not F-16 level

F/A-18A performance slightly worse F-14A Tomcat it’s true

But I think F/A-18A CAS & ground-attack role better F-14A & F-14B Tomcat because Air-to-Ground ordnance a wider variety than F-14B

[Kingtiez]

I don’t believe it has the wrong APFSDS, Gaijin supposedly used the mock-up APFSDS which may be elusive Zaraysk. The round you speak of (Grifel) can only be fired from the 2A83 and has much penetration, 1024mm at 2000m.

[somebody_Else]

The exhaust port. The GTD-1250 uses a different port design.

Visually you can tell the difference by the grill pattern, a grid for the older GTD-1000 or rectangular grille for the GTD-1250.

The years don’t mean much because it was just an old T-80BV modified for firepower testing. There wasn’t any reason to upgrade the engine just to test the 152mm cannon.

[Miraz05]

N word MBT? XD

[UnHolySausage]

yes, but my lawyer says that i shouldnt answer this further away

[Nowel]

are you sure that they need to change the grill when they use the GTD 1250? because there are some bvm that retained the old pattern of grill

[Miraz05]

Did someone drive over this round? why is this flat?

[AlvisWisla]

I just tie 3BM60, L27, and DM43-adjacent rounds cause it’s too little difference.

[somebody_Else]

Very early ones had the old grille, but there had to have been a reason to change it.

Either some early T-80BVM’s still had the old 1100HP engine, or the old exhaust port design wasn’t adequate enough with the new engine.

[LorentzManifolds]

@Kingtiez

Gaijin supposedly used the mock-up APFSDS which may be elusive Zaraysk.

You mean this one?

[Serkay64]

Like we got the KF41?