it definitely does not? also its 156 get it right
You barely play US top tier, so idk why you are still talking.
i dont need to? and im still talking because were in a public thread mate
I mean ya its a public thread, but what you have said has no merit, so I guess yap away.
okay yk what, tell me why we need the sepv3
So we can have some 2a7/122 counterparts to the game, and that goes to every nation that doesn’t have them.
2 Likes
the sepv2/V1 is a 2a7/122 counterpart.
Wild that you believe that lmao.
1 Like
wild that you dont? the 2a7/122 glaze is getting out of hand
It ain’t glaze, they are so brain dead, easy to play compared to what they go against aside from the BMPT, which everyone suffers.
ok im gonna write something up rq and it obviously wont be completely accurate but it wont be bad
What im doing is im gonna rate the SEPV2 the 2A7V and the 122B+ on a point system
Overall:
Abrams: 5
2a7V: 2
122B+: 3
winner: Abrams
Mobility: Abrams (better acceleration than both + better top speed than the 2a7v) + 1 points
Firepower: Abrams (2nd most pen with better ready rack and reload rate) +1 points
Armour: 122B+ (composite screens front and side) + 1 point
Survivability: 122B+ (Blowout panels + filled with spall liners) +1 point
Gun handling: (tied between the 2 leopards) +1 point to both
AA capability: Abrams (M30A1 MPAT + 2 .50 cals + 2 7.62mm) + 1 point
Ammo stowage: Abrams (can take 37 rounds in the bustle with a blowout panel) +1 point
Tech: Abrams (LWS + ESS) +1 point
Round: 2A7V (L/55 DM53 penning 650MM) + 1 point
Thats not a great way to compare vehicles
1 Like
true but still
Easiest vehicle to disable in top tier: Abrams +1
Killable by auto cannons from the front: Abrams+1
God no please
worst top tier nato hump: leopard 2a7v and 122b +1 point
… do you know how NotebookLM works?
Ha it’s evolving X)
It’s the whole name now
I have fulfilled my obligation to touch warthunder once more within a week so that I may continue to yap until the next week has come.