where did I say that I just said planned
1 Like
still waiting for the Antarctica sub tree
penguins and there navy seals want revenge for there fish.
Glorious Democratic Penguins Republic
2 Likes
Yeah but they were asking if they had any plans to add them soon
soon to me when it comes to Gajin means now to the heat death of the earth
anyone else having problems logging onto Gaijin market place? I can only access legacy version for some reason
Hey. Plans can also be about longer term plans and considerations rather than just shorter term. Naturally we still have these same ideas, but the bulk of 2025 and into 26 was about fleshing out sub-trees and the nations within existing game nations to better fill gaps within existing trees.
9 Likes
This must mean a swiss ground sub tree soon
They said Korea is a long-term plan, so that is already something even if it’s probably not soon. THey also said it might not be the next nation added, implying there’s another first.
My guess is some flavor of Poland/Czechoslovakia tree, but that’s just a guess. Could also be something like Yugoslavia with the leaked J-22 or maybe some form of LATAM tree with the leaked Pucara, or something completely different.
3 Likes
This century at least?
So this year we can expect more sub-tree content instead of new tech tree content right?
as I stated when announced Korea might get added with the INF mode due to it being the start of the tech tree
Hopefuly this means the greek subtree is soon; Israel was the most needed back then and its gonna end up being the last TT in receive a subtree ;(
Cant wait to fill in some AA & Light tank gaps
1 Like
since greece is a supposed “long term plan” as you said before. should we expect a full on subtree line of its own or something like the malaysian subtree aka 3 whole jets at the last tier.
You’ll get a greek spitfire (if you pay the battlepass) and eventually a leopard 2a4 premium (always bet on the 2a4 premium)
@Smin1080p_WT I know you’re likely not the best person to ask but for bug reports I’ve found myself a rather curious question…
What constitutes “actual operational capability” for a weapon on an aircraft? And more so what kind of proof would the devs be looking for to prove that something is “operationally capable” on something?
Thanks in advance.
jokes aside just give me some AA, light tanks and an AESA fighter
Boat is next
Hey. It just needs to be proven the aircraft is capable of operating that weapon on a technical level. As in all of the required elements to operate that weapon are in place.
Then its down to the developers to decide once the report is passed.
2 Likes