holy moly
Israel at least has a 11.3 to play with it, the problem is that nobody will use it because better options exist
These premiums have been depressing so far and it gives a really bad image of the update when they come first. And personally I don’t have much hope for TT vehicles since they’re usually scarce and barely unique most of the time.
Gaijin when
1 Like
We really need a pinned message BiliBili style, that goes across the interface with “No teaser today”.
You’re more than entitled to that opinion might be forgetting the fact it is subjective but fair enough.
Meanwhile, these effects are being added to Enlisted.
I hope they’ll be improved on War Thunder as well.
3 Likes
like 30/40 ~vehicles last update were TT or Squadron?
^not including events
2 Likes
f16v ? ?
as i said the most searches i have see says nothing about internal storage but nothing official, if you have seen any sources that say they can carry internally send them to me this one that seems legit says 2 ATGMs Fact Sheet: Hunter Armoured Fighting Vehicle | Ministry of Defence
sqaudron vehicles arent a good thing though, and i cant recall 1 memorable vehicle from the last update other than like the AS90
??
The Hunter AFV will likely be far more fun than the Namers and Eitan. Likely better too.
lower br so no lineup and less spikes just for better mobility
because its fast? its still huge and i bet all your ammo will be gone if they fire your turret
pretty big deal considering the Eitan + Namer are heavy w/o armour and slow.
and yet they still miss a lot of the armor they have IRL
yeah… thats my point, “w/o armour” → “without armour”
1 Like
Namers: mediocre survivability, situational-mediocre armor and garbage mobility.
Hunter: likely mediocre survivability, likely mediocre armor and decent-good mobility.
Seems pretty clear to me.