Nice
Yes
1 Like
Killer Transit Van or KTV was a key stepping stone for the ground launched Brimstone haha.
1 Like
You’ve been spamming the same question over and over again.
Aside from the disingenuous nature of the question, which totally ignores the different cases that the discussed vehicles represent.
I think it’s best for you two to simply agree to disagree. This argument between you has been going on for a while and it’s just looping around at this point.
1 Like
It’s like 90% German and 10% Israeli.
But if you really want to be pedantic about it, there is also the Leo 2SG without any of the Israeli sights.
This one is definitely German.
bro I get what youre saying but its kinda irrelevant because yeah ig if russia didnt have a tech tree gaijin might put them in france with that reasoning, gaijin is just like that sometimes
The BM Oplot T is a Ukrainian tank, not a Russian one. Don’t confuse it.
he said it has a Russian tank and i corrected him it has a Soviet one (and later Ukraine modified it even more)
You’re wrong here too. The T80UD was Soviet, it was the predecessor of the T84 (Ukrainian). The BM Oplot is a modernization of the T84.
I think we can both agree their is a difference between a constructive conversation and just spamming add it to X nation.
Hello can we get an update on sound mods? Disabling and enabling them several times with radio-silence from developers, What is going on?
that is a modernization of the Soviet T-80
The T84 is a modification of the T80UD, and the T80UD is naturally a T80, but don’t confuse the entire T84 family, which are made in Kharkov and Ukrainian.
its like calling the ztz96 a t54 though, the t84s were built in ukraine post soviet collapse
Spam it to Japan!!
now we definitely need vehicle based VLS atgm’s
yea they are Ukrainian tanks based on the Soviet T-80, i was defending them from the guy saying its Russian
1 Like
There’s no way they can be Russian. It’s funny to hear these days that Ukraine and Russia are one and the same.
While I feel it could have been incorporated entirely into the Japan TT, along with the other ASEAN nations. Since the other nations already existing in the Japan TT (Thai/Indo/Msia) by themselves are quite small to be a full “sub-tree”. A combined ASEAN as a Sub-Tree could have been possible with its many unique variants of upgrades and vehicles.
I find it regrettable that Gaijin has decided to split SG up.
However, the reasoning Gaijin gave for e.g. Hunter AFV to be in Israel does make sense from a technology point of view. Since its armaments are entirely Israeli.
Could it help gameplay-wise for both nations?
Arguably it might have been more interesting for Japan to get its first Fire and Forget Ground vehicle for gameplay, since Israel already has 3x of such vehicles.
Being added in Israel, however, does provide a slightly faster, less protected Namer 30 gameplay. If that might be different enough for it to be in the Israeli tree.
1 Like
but it wouldn’t be the rumor roundup forum without some random argument between 2 people that was going nowhere