Hungarian 2a7 was added later then German 2a7, all AH-64E were added few updates later then American AH-64E, so i assume Australian Sepv3 would also be added later
Well then the queues for the USSR on the top tier will become endless.
Yeah, if they give the M829A2 SEPV3, it’ll be ridiculous. It’s like giving the Super Hornet an AIm-9B.
1 Like
Idk, just a guess
they don’t care
western tanks must stay inferior
2 Likes
I mean, they did give the super hornet the 9m when it should ATLEAST get the block 1 9x, lmao
And you think gaijin cares about the queue times? when they first added the BMPT trying to queue into any top tier match was almost impossible
1 Like
Yes, but because most players switched to the USSR, huge queues arose. Soviet players started complaining that they were spending more time in queues than in battle.
That leak is fake as hell and it’s so obvious. I don’t think the M1A2 AIM even exists, it being added for Australia makes it even more unbelievable.
but that’s because the Meta and BR in Air is much more heavily reliant on Missiles and you can’t just add 9X to one plane and call it a day
im ground having one More armored tank is a normal situation
Even the current Abrams are equal to or even superior to all T-series, let alone the 2A7s/122s.
Don’t know why so many people think that the leak list is real. Isn’t it just based on the first one that appeared with extra stuff added to it?
1 Like
This source had previously published leaks. And everything they published was predicted.
for me it was simply the 4 Abrams, like no new Abrams in 2 years for the US and all of a sudden we get 4 one being a second squadron vehicle that doesn’t exist and would only be .7 BR higher lmao.
Okay, so share a link to those perviously published leaks? Until I see those previous leaks I’ll continue to call BS.
It’s mostly hopium. I know a lot of people want the SEPv3 for example (whether that be because of their personal skill issue or for actual personal reasons doesn’t matter). It’s easy to believe something if you want it to be true.
completely agree but I’m going to say this after buying a premium t72 back in the sale it feels so much more tanky, but I blame simply the size of weakspots that cripple the tank and most situations average players find themselves in
100% in all honesty if I saw a leak that included the m3a4 and had some of the leaks turn out right because they came from a good source I would believe the fake for a bit.
Gaijin please give me it
1 Like
well the US F-35s have test fired the Meteor (can’t find the image) and are going through more testing for the British F-35Bs, while Italy is sponsoring it for the F-35As
F-35B
and with how the tech/mission capability is effectively linked between the A,B, and C models, if one nations F-35 can use it then the others theoretically can too
2 Likes
They have test fired it? I thought they have carried inert meteor so far
yes and no, its not so much the pylon as it is the connector for the electronics, however, it does mean any aircraft that can use the 9M can use the 9X, as there is footage of modern F-15s using AIM-9M as live fire training missiles instead of the 9Xs, and with how gaijin is just giving us a non-descript 9M across all years of aircraft, i think the 9L/9M/9X compatibility would be there as well, just as long as the aircraft was in service by the time the 9X hit the shelves