I thought the best available docs for the Raven (I think thats the right radar name?) was 230km.
Interesting
I thought the best available docs for the Raven (I think thats the right radar name?) was 230km.
Interesting
I have the feeling that top tier ground stuff has pretty much been abandoned, or rather that the few noteworthy things that remain are being preserved for as long as possible. Not even copy paste stuff like SLOP V3 or BVM obr.2023 gets added.
Should be something like that but you know Gaijin and their questionable actions upon on certain reports :D
And yes its called RAVEN.
Ah right yeah…
Those damn marketing lies
Watch how they gonna butcher EW suites on both JAS39E and EFT cause they will not believe that Europeans can actually make one of the best EW suites :D
Gotta wait for the M1304 to finish development ig, they showed off one with ATGMs but it’s not the fielded variant
“I don’t like the idea of limiting a vehicles capabilities for the sake of putting it somewhere. I 100% understand why you would do this if you genuinely had nothing to put in that space, but there is also 100% another vehicle that would be as capable as an LAV-600 with fewer ammunition choices, without removing from its capabilities, that the US developed.”
Ammunition has been limited on plenty of other vehicles as a balancing measure, so in the context of War Thunder I don’t see an issue.
Yes, in theory you can take an autocannon vehicle onto the flank (map dependant), but this is only viable if you’re playing against tunnel-visioned players. Anyone competent will know these routes and be watching.
The M3 Bradley is at 8.3, so are you wanting a LAV-25 at 8.0 or even 7.7 where it can fight late WW2 tanks and unstabilised Cold War vehicles?
Of course!, there is no way Leonardo or SAAB can build anything on-par with 1980 ish era soviet ECM
Blink twice if the SEPv3 is coming this major
Meanwhile in real life JAS39E and EFT flies like dedicated Jammers :D
Mind if I ask why we’re seeing PL-12A and AIM-120D but not AAM-4B? Is it because there wasn’t enough community requests regarding the missile?
Ah yes love maps how you can get immediately spawn killed in like the first 2 mins

Resolving the bug reports for base AAM-4 would already be enough tbh.
as with MICA EM…
Pobably something like
“Japan has an Su-30 with R-77-1 so they dont need any other buffs at this time”
Why not both? Why not try and get the F-2A to be put in a position or battle-rating where it could also receive AAM-5s?
Probably would be awkward in its current battle rating to ever get AAM-5
That reminds me, where does the Su-30MKM sit, does it sit below the F-2A?
It would most likely raise the BR of the F-2A too high, most of us would prefer to keep it at 13.7, while AAM-3 and AAM-4 corrections would def make it more potent already, but not too strong.
Su-30 is 14.3 in line 5
F-2A is 13.7 in Line 2
But that perspective is a bit weird to me because I would suspect that someone who really likes the F-2A would want to see it fully fledged out one day, with AAM-4B and AAM-5s.
Will the PL-12A only be for the J-10C or will something else get it?