Hello @Smin1080p_WT , hope you’re having a great Saturday;
A few weeks ago, in the official announcement of rank IX made by Stona, it was mentioned that the jets needed to go from rank XIII to IX were probably going to be 3, could we know though how significant the RP increase will be?
Hopefully there won’t be a rp increase of those but a rp decrease of things below like how things went for the previous ranks
I thought technical assistance and cooperation from China and Russia were a given in this case!
Probably more than assistance tbh, I have a hard time imagining how they could have any kind of military engineers community considering they never (afaik) developed anything modern before
I honestly would expect an increase, but the question is how significant;
Sometimes from rank XII to XIII you can see a jump from 300/350k to 400k rp, which is quite a bit, a similar jump for rank IX would require us to research basically half a million rp :O
That’s exactly my point.
Analysis shows that the Chinese may be the masterminds behind this tank’s development; there are many pieces, components and modules pulled straight from ZTZ-99 and VT-4.
Therefore I don’t find it so unbelievable to think that it may be, in fact, a functional tank and not “hahah T-62 with cardboard sheets”.
I dunno, I just want lower ranks to have their costs reduced since that’s what I play the most xD
Hopefully that will happen again since it did last times
Oh for sure! Though we still have to see if we get any kind of info on those, as for now they’re just a few images
I am honestly Expecting at least 450K RP for Rank IX
480K or 500K wouldn’t be unbelievable imo
Just in case I’m unlocking as many Rank IXs as I can right now xD.
As soon as I’m done with Rafale, I’ll get Golden Eagle, F-18E and EF AESA. Just for good measure.
Not only for the Rank IX requirements themselves; but also expect the Rank IX UNLOCK requirement to be: “ah, yes, you must research and purchase 6 Rank VIII planes to unlock Rank IX, so now you have to grind every single line lol lol”.
According to Stona the requirement will be 3 so should be fine
Oh, I missed that, nice to have that info!
Outlandish cope
Glazing anything North Korean should be a crime
What does this have to do with China? China has had no military ties with North Korea for a long time; it’s Russia that has the most.
It’s not that they don’t like calling Australia a subtree.
The fact is that they don’t consider Australia a subtree.
Lmao what the hell
Apparently saying; “hey, this tank may actually be a tank of some sort and not a cardboard mockup” is now “glacing” xD
No it is not, the F and E are identical for armament
It is acceptable to report missing weapons ingame. It happens all the time.
I still find it odd considering it’s a similar size in vehicles to South Africa (23 South African to 17 Australian) and that both have 1 vehicle in a none UK tree.
At least it gives me hope for a Canada-Austrila-New Zealand tree one day.
A bug/issue report requires sources directly linked to the vehicle which the report is filed for
The report only included a picture of a F/A-18F and no other valid reliable sources
The moderator is right in saying that the F/A-18E and F are different variants and the report didn’t provide sufficient info to prove that the E can carry the same weapons as the F