I think it means there more Polish bias than Nordic bias.
Also freaking Poland gets voice lines but not us big sad
Voicelines aren’t even good as well
1 Like
Osa-class 👀👀👀Missile boat when?👀👀
It’s an uparmored version of the Cockerill CSE 90LP turret.
But there was also the Marder Medium Tank RI developed for Indonesia which was very similar to the TAM. It’s based on the Marder Revolution, but specifically catered to Indonesian interests.
Very similar to Oplot-P could’ve been had they actually added it and not just the trialed Oplot-M
2 Likes
Sadly only has a machine gun, so still not enough to intercept munitions.
But maybe with the growing drone threat they could revisit the idea of a gun/missile platform eventually
1 Like
Bro what are you smoking.
There is also the same thing with add-on armor:
Spoiler
2 Likes
No no, I completely understand what you’re saying, it’s just wrong/misinterpretation of what I originally said. I was referring to Gaijin might want to market the tree as “Yugoslavia” rather than “Balkan alliance” because they haven’t added alliance tech trees yet and it seems they don’t want to.
Yes the theoretical tree where you barely include half of Hungary’s ground vehicles. To be fair you didn’t include enough of Romania’s vehicles either, which supports my point of cramming two subtrees into the space of one will just result in two ruined subtrees instead of one good subtree. It caps the number of vehicles from all three countries so they will never be able to get all their vehicles. That’s not a good solution.
Not true. You missed out the Mistral UNIMOG (modern missile SPAA which is mass produced and actively used by the Hungarian military), the 2b9 AMB/MT-LB, Csepel D-344 KPVT/ZU-23 (both useful cold war SPAAs), Csepel D-350 MLRS, DE-81SP RÁBA H9/UNIMOG, BMP-BTR, etc. I know some of these are quite obscure but it doesn’t mean they don’t exist and shouldn’t be added. You act like Hungary is WW2 only and Romania is cold war only, when Hungary also has some cold war stuff, and Romania also has some WW2 stuff, so there’s a lot of overlap, which is why they shouldn’t be in the same subtree.
That can literally be used against you, since Hungary has enough similar vehicles in areas where Romania has some stuff, so Romania is excessive in the Hungarian subtree too.
Since it’s a joint Romani-Yugoslavian project, that supports my point all the more that they should be in the same tree.
You can’t seriously say that while thinking Italy and Hungary don’t offer enough vehicles. Italy + Hungary have far more than Yugoslavia + Bulgaria, so Romania is needed much more for the Yugoslavian tree than the Italian one.
Except I wasn’t talking about who makes more sense in the Italian tree, that question has already been answered by Gaijin. I was talking about where Romania makes more sense, either to also be shoehorned into the Italian tree, or a much more natural and logical fit in the Yugoslavian tree.
Ok, I see that, we can just agree to disagree.
You think it should be: Italy (+ Hungary + Romania) and Yugoslavia (+ Bulgaria)
While I think it should be: Italy (+ Hungary) and Yugoslavia (+ Romania + Bulgaria)
I believe my approach is more logical and would result in more balanced trees, but you really want Romania to be in a subtree with Hungary.
Hungary is the official subtree, while Romania along with Spain, Portugal, Turkey, Brazil, Oman, etc. are all just premium/event gapfillers. This is also why they still have a vehicle in the French tree. It is completely possible (and somewhat likely) for some of these nations to eventually be moved out of the Italian tech tree into a new tree when the time comes. This isn’t a question of “when will Gaijin expand the Romanian subtree”, but more a question of when will Romania find a proper place in the game for them to get researchable lines. The subtree for Italy was specifically marketed as a Hungarian one, not a Hungaro-Romanian one. Romania can very easily (and should) be moved into a new tree, with a Yugoslavian tree being the best option imho.
1 Like
Everything
Guess I should’ve added /S since most people look at everything with face value
@Smin1080p_WT @Piciu713
hey guys i want to ask you about something. why the dev didnt decide to add the UMPK bomb to other flankers ?
leaving the fab 1500 to the side, the fab 500 umpk on the su24 could easly be emplemented to the su34 and 30sm. you prob gonna tell me about the grom but the problem is the grom is too smart.
when going fot the target, the grom need to go above and then do a 90* dive rather then actual glide like the umpk.
thanks is advance
Man, I would play a proper CIWS like the HVSD/ADAMS all day, just to annoy CAS players
2 Likes
Nope, it was confirmed by @Smin1080p_WT multiple times that Romanian vehicles are placed in the Italian tree. Other nations mentioned by you are represented by vehicles made by Italy or based on Italian stuff: AMX A-1, G.91 R/4, T-129, F-104S, VRCC, Centauro RGO.
3 Likes
What plane is that?
C-RAM truck?
Google lens says F-35 and my eyes make me believe that it is correct in saying that the picture shows F-35s
3 Likes
LPWS (or Centurion C-RAM) on HEMTT
But yeah, C-RAM truck works as well
1 Like
Maybe they are using the weights to simulate the radar for some reason
Its an instructional air-frame that isn’t flight worthy due to it being damaged in a fire around 2016
3 Likes
that airframe was damaged in an accident
and only remains for training stuff
edit:
what @Danzig_A11 said
1 Like
My personal opinion is to work more on gameplay rather than big updates for this reason (top game is not very balanced)
1 Like