More of the unique Israeli vehicles and the gun launched Lahat ATGM (we need more gun launched missiles imo)
I wonder if the LAV 25 and similar vehicles are less looked at for update vehicles given the backlash non remote control 30mm SPAA have around them, a 25mm would likely be out at 9.3 due to its mobility regardless and would probably cause them to have to deal with a large selection of complaints about the vehicles BR.
while i think about it, Merkava Mk.4M 400 should probably get the LAHAT, or if even better, give the LAHAT to the TZEFA D/E
1 Like
I wonder if we could have multination line-ups. You either have vehichles from the same tech-tree, just like now.
Or
Vehichles from the same operator, from any tech-tree, but you can’t use any vehichle that wasn’t used by that operator.
Not sure if it would be possible to implement. You would still had to play multiple trees, but at least you could use your vehichle, and probably would reduce Copypaste overall.
Are you suggesting the LAV-25 would be at 9.3 or am I misreading something?
Perhaps, given gaijin loves to over BR the terrible Bushmaster ifvs, besides it would be higher BR than the BMP-25T
whats that ?
1 Like
I mean, whether Gaijin over BR’s bushmasters is one thing, but 9.3 for an LAV-25 is a little over the top. It has no missiles, no APFSDS, no LRF, and no thermals. It is just a stabilized auto cannon that shoots APDS and can go 60mph, and is only resistant to small arms fire.
Finnish BMP with Lav 25 turret, it was actually tried in a few nation including Poland
3 Likes
The LAV-25 probably is just a very low priority vehicle
They don’t even need an entirely new model, as the LAV-AD is a LAV-25 as well
That depends if they use the same person who modeled the LAV AD otherwise it would be a new model
oh wow first time hearing about this
I can see this quickly devolve into line-ups of only the best possible vehicles, leaving everything else unplayed. Which would triple the number of DOA stuff, bad idea all around.
This would work if we and industries for trees, and not nations. Under the current system, not only do they paint other nations in a negative light(furthering the propaganda against the important military history of those nations), but it also punishes them as they need to grind more than one tree, while those who have a tree don’t.
It’s not that deep, man
This is something I don’t understand. The LAV-25 is easily one of the most recognizable vehicles of the USMC. It would also be the first wheeled IFV in the US TT, and fill the light tank gap between 7.0-8.0. Also, another issue probably subject to “low priority” is the US is the only nation in the game, that doesn’t have a missile carrier in its TT. Gaijins priorities really puzzle me sometimes.
1 Like
Also you mention model might I remind you we still don’t have the Ilmatorjuntapanssarivaunu 90
Poland mentioned 💪💪💪💪
3 Likes
Yeah quite a few nations tried it since the Canadians wanted to try selling their turrets compatibility with old Soviet BMP chassis’
You know why you still don’t have the T-72 T-55 Marksman
It’s Finnish, man
Edit: Mixed up the hull
Yeah but we didn’t stop there
2 Likes