From what information has been floating since the disclosure I would temper your expectations of the 120D. As of right now expect a 120C with more burn time.
typical bug report manager #1 stuff
Again, it’s just a guess.
Sensible placement of vehicles definitely wasn’t a priority in the past, dunno why it apparently matters now
Spoiler
Maybe some UI designer with an OCD got promoted lol
As for Sweden, if they majority of the ground TT needs a re-arrangement, you might as well do the whole thing
The air tree obviously could use a fifth column nowadays
The devblog for the F/A-18F doesn’t mention GBU-53s either
They do list all the other GBUs that the F/A-18E has tho
I can calm you down a bit:
Czechoslovakia will probably appear at some point, but definitely not as Soviet subtree, maybe as a part of some Eastern European TT. Actually I don’t think USSR needs any subtree with all the stuff it could get from its republics.
As for Soviet tech in the Italian TT, well, it’s already happened.
1 Like
both should get them anyways, the bug report manager is in the wrong since the only functional difference is reduced fuel (to fit the extra seat) and higher empty weight
How is the manager in the wrong, it literally isn’t a bug
F/A-18F != F/A-18E is a bad reason
5th column isn’t happening they already shoved Norway into the strike fighter line. Sweden will probably be the only nation without a 5th air line going into the future. Israel should get one with greece but I’m not super certain on that one so I’ll just leave it at maybe 50 50 it joins sweden
1 Like
My brother in Christ, the GBU 53 isn’t in the game
How is that a bug?
bug report manager said F/A-18E != F/A-18F for the gbu-53 report which doesnt make sense, they shouldve just said it isnt ingame, which it should have been 2 updates ago
His point is the bug report was closed out cause E isn’t the F not that it’s not in the game. The ticket was closed on a bad pretense. Rather than GBU-53 is not in game.
2 Likes
these bug mods can’t be real
1 Like
Looking at other closed bug reports regarding the GBU 53, they seem to avoid outright saying that the GBU 53 isn’t in the game yet
Another report got closed and the manager linked to the Tornado GR.4 devblog, which Said that mmW weapons wouldn’t be added, which doesn’t really matter for the GBU 53
Other reports regarding the Stormbreaker just don’t get closed in the first place and there still is an open one for the F/A-18E which doesn’t rely as much on the F variant
Edit: the F/A-18E != F/A-18F reason in that case is correct, the picture is of a F variant and there are no other valid reliable sources listed in the report
I wonder, with us getting IRST pods, will the sniper pod gain IRST functionality?
6 Likes
Only British mains have managed to turn this thread into “Britain suffers rumor roundup” multiple times by now, no other nation mains have that feat.
So while yes, other nations cry a lot too. But the British main victim complex is honestly wild.
5 Likes
That’s actually nice to hear.
are we getting IRST pods ingame now? I haven’t heard about this
Even outside of this thread if you go to the machinery of war section you can fins multiple instances of somebody derailing a thread to complain about how vehicle “x” suffers worse than vehcile “y” and that nation “y” has it better than everybody else. And usually like 85% of the time they are a British main or heavily british biased. And it shows when they make insane comments like “the BMP-2(base model not the M) should be 10.3” or “the desert warrior is worse than the 8.0 warrior” or several other examples.
5 Likes