I would gladly see Romania and even Chechslovakia in the same Minor axis tree. But the thing is the post war soviet epuipment are hardly in line with the italian tree, which is a problem. But I don’t want to see WW2 era Chech designs in the soviet tree either. Splitting the WW2 and postwar trees would be a solution, but we are not trusting the devs with that, as bluewater and coastal exist.
Note: Gaijin if you are currently reworking trees, that’s fine I guess, but please please do NOT increase the grind 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
When has weird or random vehicle placements stopped gaijin? They put a Swedish hunter in the Finnish air like on release, it’s still there,
Only thing Sweden needs is a rearrangement of 1.0-10.0 ground and the entire air tree needs more space there’s no room for anything (not that they’ll add anything anyways)
From what information has been floating since the disclosure I would temper your expectations of the 120D. As of right now expect a 120C with more burn time.
Czechoslovakia will probably appear at some point, but definitely not as Soviet subtree, maybe as a part of some Eastern European TT. Actually I don’t think USSR needs any subtree with all the stuff it could get from its republics.
As for Soviet tech in the Italian TT, well, it’s already happened.
both should get them anyways, the bug report manager is in the wrong since the only functional difference is reduced fuel (to fit the extra seat) and higher empty weight
5th column isn’t happening they already shoved Norway into the strike fighter line. Sweden will probably be the only nation without a 5th air line going into the future. Israel should get one with greece but I’m not super certain on that one so I’ll just leave it at maybe 50 50 it joins sweden
bug report manager said F/A-18E != F/A-18F for the gbu-53 report which doesnt make sense, they shouldve just said it isnt ingame, which it should have been 2 updates ago
His point is the bug report was closed out cause E isn’t the F not that it’s not in the game. The ticket was closed on a bad pretense. Rather than GBU-53 is not in game.
Looking at other closed bug reports regarding the GBU 53, they seem to avoid outright saying that the GBU 53 isn’t in the game yet
Another report got closed and the manager linked to the Tornado GR.4 devblog, which Said that mmW weapons wouldn’t be added, which doesn’t really matter for the GBU 53
Other reports regarding the Stormbreaker just don’t get closed in the first place and there still is an open one for the F/A-18E which doesn’t rely as much on the F variant
Edit: the F/A-18E != F/A-18F reason in that case is correct, the picture is of a F variant and there are no other valid reliable sources listed in the report