yeah, i never said it does.
its why i was wondering why it would be such an issue (other than raw missile count) to add the one with 12 launchers without the illuminator. i probably misread somethihng from earlier, i thought werecat said the arh needs the illuminator, which is why i got confused
have fun with the N001 and the RVV-AE
1 Like
No, if ARH existed, it would not need it, but it does not exist, so it needs the illumination radar. That is, as we get 1+2 in game, we will get a search radar, and 2 launchers with FCR if it comes as multi vehicle system.
Man the thought of getting that thing instead of a domestic option makes me sick lol
the 9M317M is actively being used in a place we shall not name though
Its usage there is not a problem. If it was born because of that, it would be.
i thought china got r-77-1?
and the 9M317M is arh, we both agree on that right?
No. It is a missile used by that system, so it is SARH.
Devblog in 5,4,3,2,1…
i agree the Su-30MK would be irellevant as it basically is a J-11A without a MAWs from my understanding
1 Like
then how come everything that talks about the missile will tell me its arh. like im not discrediting you, but y’know. whole thing seems weird
it gets l-150 and much more arh missiles
It’s not tho, don’t supposed ARH versions like for these have the “-A” suffix as well?
and that wont make it any more relevant
it still will be a worse Su-27SM
“much more” being 2
7 Likes
where is that said though. im literally looking for any source that says its sarh and i cant find any
at least for multirole it will save china, currently china multirole reeks
Well, idk, as nowhere did it being called ARH. If it were to be 9M317MA(or simply A, i dont remember), so a designation for the ARH missile that never came, sure, but nowhere for the pure M. A in the name also lines up with russian scheme of naming things, like E for export