Point being you’re only considering one point of the argument and not taking into account that it was a non-US company (MDBA) that integrated the missile after being awarded a contract by the British MoD
4 Likes
Did you skip over the part where Boeing was part of it too? And provided the actual helicopter
Did you skip the part where i said the US and UK have equal arguments to receive it?
1 Like
Wait hold on, your telling me the F-5C isn’t modeled after the real F-5C. This is highly unacceptable this game is meant to be realistic. Time to leave an angry note on gaijin desk : (
“into the bin it goes”
gaijin to anything
1 Like
The UK argument is based on artificial buffs and favored treatment
MBDA is partially owned by BAe. whose subsidiary BAe Dynamics became MBDA UK (hint: BD in MBDA stands for BAe Dynamics). National projects with MBDA are done via their national subsidiaries for example MBDA France makes the MICA which other MBDA entities didn’t fund and don’t own
Steal a missile
My Guys it is a British missile who even gave it to you to integrate
Every integration of any foreign weapons is done on US aircraft or Helicopter
This is not news it is same thing with all integration
Like to integrate spike on the Wildcat for South Korea they tested on a British one
7 Likes
LMAO, showing your true colours now. Fair enough, not worth arguing then.
6 Likes
Your own sources prove me right
I declare it a japanese missile now, end of debate
1 Like
Yeah, so they should get it
Think Defence proves that the british tech tree receives favoured treatment from Gaijin?
So true AH-64E with JAGM and Brimstone to Japan
Holy US cope lmao.
10 Likes
No I declare it a Camelot missile
It proves only American AH-64E integrated and fired Brimstone II
nahhhh its 100% german
what are we arguing about this time
Quartas is embarrassing himself again
4 Likes