I agree. Technically Falklands is 2kmx2km larger, but it’s so badly utelised maps that it ends up one of the smaller air maps in the game.
1 Like
They will be, all CFTs in-game are removable.
Meteor, Banshee, F-15E/I, Mirage 3S, etc.
F-16XL?
err- Grant Sexton? That’s the first I heard of that.
It was
Ram - Sexton I
Grizzly - Sexton II
The British wanted slightly different specs, and that’s why the Sexton II exists.
2 Likes
You essentially are telling me a worse AMX 10RC is good while its at a higher BR and worse? Logic much? Again given the number of CQC maps gaijin throws this vehicle will more than likely be niche and not worth pulling.
Again why would i want to play a slower light tank without thermals thats a higher BR than the AMX 10RC?
im getting mixed up with the other SPH we were discussing a while ago forgive me.
So US can get pretty much anything other countries want tested on their Apaches, but not the other way around?
P4 isnt next gen tho
And derby er is perfect equivlant for r77-1
F-16XL is also 9600kg empty, which while heavier than F-16I by almost 1 ton, still fits in the light fighter category.
Light fighter is weapon count and mass, and while the mass changes from military to military, less than 10 tons empty with less than 4 tons of internal fuel tends to be the average masses for light fighters.
Something worth remembering is that iirc they removed some of the composite on the front of the hull to fit the ERA on the oplot. And gaijin is very hit or miss when it comes to ERA modeling. So it very well could just be made of paper.
(I could also be wrong about this and be thinking of another tank)
1 Like
From images I saw
There’s a dispenser in CFT so… I don’t know
Fair point though I guess… You can pick less weight (and less fuel) but less CMs or take more CMs but at cost of more weight
F16i is 10t empty
if you want to start drama and arguments sure but gaijin will probably rule it like they did with the AH 1 where it got the trailed ATASK
1 Like
😭
I mean, doesnt realy matter…
The stab was the reason why it got changed…
So, it was the Stab and not Thermal as I said…
Alright, appreciate it
Does the TML not get an autoloader? Also, the TML would have better ammunition, wouldn’t it?
Wait, so did no British Apache fire a starstreak or do you mean it was also trialled on a British AH-64
Again it could mount a stabilizer, its just gaijin had no idea if it had ome installed or not. They could choose to add it with the stabilizer given it will be the highest BR Light tank without a stabilizer.
It should come with the stabilizer given its stated it can mount one, adding it without one while being at 9.3.is a poor decision given the AMX 10RC sits at 8.7 and the type 16 (p) is also 9.3 with LWS and thermals. Again its poor balancing.
TML is literally the AMX 10RC without the thermal sight.