@Smin1080p_WT can we expect modern ships next year? i think many player will go to naval once we start getting some subs and missile cruisers
but the the German EF has now more games played and a higher winrate than the other ones
would kinda just become exocet battles lets be real
5% increase in players max, the problem with naval gameplay is that it needs something more interesting, like a crazy soundtrack or something to spice it up
hopefully gaijin will add this in a nerfed state
I bought the CV90105 TML, lost it and now it’s being added as a base TT vehicle
This is so insulting
Each side just launching their missiles and then waiting for their inevitable demise, only to then respawn and do the same thing again lol
likley just out of sheer numbers brute forcing sim matches
at this point i’d have prefered if they went with aster 15 or a MICA VL
Aster 30 is far too overkill
Also block future improvments (now MICA VL will be filler and only Aster Block 1 NT can be added as an amelioration)
I thought that was wild too 😳
it would be unbelievably mid lmao. at least we can start using some spicier jets for naval airstrikes
If the CM-502 and LMUR is added it won’t be.
Are you expecting them to just gift you the TML after already swapping the TML out with the CV90105 for free?
You can always go back to the old rockets
Patriot when?
@Smin1080p_WT I’m sory to bother, I know it’s a leak list and everything and the dev server is just a couple days away but would it be possible to get some clarification on if a premium variant of the CV90105 TML will be available for people who originally purchased it?
Neither of those can be given their respective IRL ranges, as it undermines the careful balance of heli missile range and evading FNFs
@Midakolol
Spoiler: Nothing changes. New SPAA is still superior ranging to IR AGM carriers.
The tracking range doesn’t change cause that’ll still be 14km.
The only time it will change is if it’s changed to 1.5km with LOAL added.
It was either nerf the TML losing its thermals [and potentially other things], or fix the issues with the CV90105 they intended to add and save the TML for later.
I support what they did because I would demand a refund if I lost thermals on something I purchased explicitly for that.
Also do you really want to lose your CV90105 premium just to get a worse version?
The thing is that the new AA definitely needed to be added, maybe these 3 AA don’t need to be added as powerful as they seem to be, but they are still needed.
We will also have to see how they implement the AH-64E. Britain has always had a slightly better Apache than the US until now. If the -179A are SAL the AH-64E could be only a minor improvement over the AH-64D.
It would have lost both the thermals and stab iirc
Basically making it a worse AMX-10RC