The thing is, it doesn’t have to offer anything over the Australian one, as not both of them need to be 14.0.
They’ll likely be implemented exactly the same as the US Hornets. Australian base F/A-18A will likely be 12.3 like the US one, one of the CF-188 or F/A-18A(late) will likely be the 12.7 premium and the last remaining one will be the 14.0 DOA tech tree version (mostly C&P from the US 18C(late)).
There is no reason to believe that the commonwealth Hornets will be implemented any differently than this.
EDIT: An AESA equiped legacy Hornet would also kill any hype or need for the Super Hornet, which they can now add to both the US and UK trees, so that would be shooting themselfs in the foot big time.
T180 is the same cannon as T7 used on T30, the only difference is a muzzle brake. In game T7 is capable of firing M107
And Hunnicutt states that it used HE with 43kg mass, which is VERY close to M107
Spoiler
And yes, HESH round has a different weight, so this HE is not HESH
Gaijin tends to not-nerf new premiums for a 1 or 2 major updates
T29 is like…9 years old?
And on it’s release there was a “mistake”. It had 0 chance to get ammo rack.
Are you aware of the timeline of the ATF program? the F-22 had several major changes in the air frame which often made it considered another aircraft from the YF-22. All prototypes at this stage was best effort and were not considered anything of a final product. Most in part because it was a last minute change for flying prototypes to be built that would fly and hit certain perimeters that would placate congress for development of an stealth fighter.
Northrop promised a lot of advanced changes for the actual fighter aircraft in their bid. While Lockheed bid a much more grounded and less likely to overrun in development.(Which it still did.)
At the end of the day I find this conversation weird for a discussion about an aircraft having 1 less missile capacity than the YF-22 competition.