Issue is 3km range is not equivalent to 2S6, has to be much better than that.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
They obviously can’t and won’t engage. There is no point. The only result will be disappointment for you, annoyance for them, and frustration for both.
16 Likes
Possible modeling error.
Use of different sources to model the chassis.
They started out developing one but changed it midway and so on
1 Like
I’m not mad or dissapointed.
Smin knows i’m messing around, i know the answer already.
Just some lore behind the leaks thats all ♥
I am the number 1 Ajax hater, we should’ve picked CV-90, the fact that I also think its ugly really doesn’t help, if it was ugly and good, i’d be chill but its a hexagon with some stuff bolted on imo.
Proof? And especially need proof for the second bit. Maybe against whatever the EFT has, but vs AN/APG-77 full blast in EW setup? Yeah right
*annoyance for all
1 Like
come on gaijin! make it happen :)
4 Likes
Or just picked Stormer fleet to replace CVRT in the 90s and have completed a project decades earlier and saved big bags of money to maybe even have CT40 turrets xD
Stormer/CVRT weren’t the only things that needed replacing though. Warrior also needed replacing as well.
But yeah they definitely went the wrong way about the project and if they wanted a ‘do it all vehicle’ an unproven vehicle that had hardly had any export success was not the play, the play was the immensely popular vehicle everyone else in Europe used and had numerous variants, and all they had to do was add their own turret.
Is it just me having low fps at the start of the match?
Idk man, i have an average of 15 so i dont feel it.
Didn’t think it did
Yep people need to learn how to cope with stuff, annoying a bunch of people is only end up with them blocking him
1 Like
No F-15 uses the APG-77. The F-15C that we were talking about (The APG-63(V)1), is what I was referring to. For sensor integration, it’s pretty simple. The TCS and IRST connect to the radar and RWR. These also have higher resolutions due to the massive PTID the F-14D has. For the RWR, it’s just older tech. ALQ-135 vs ALQ-165.
Sources: https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=993
https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=321
Sorry to bother you, but in the dev blog it states “the Badger IFV tops off Great Britain’s light tank line” does that mean there’s going to be a slight shuffle of the UK tree? As (at least at around the BR of similar vehicles to the Badger already in-game) the UK doesn’t really have a singular LT line per-say. Or was that just more of a figure of speech? In any case I hope you have a good day, and I’m excited to see what else comes! Ik it’s unlikely by my heart is holding out for an FV101/FV601
1 Like
Let alone the multiple IFVs that would easily be a higher BR than the Badger
A future reshuffle has never been ruled out so to speak, however the “light tank line” is currently the line featuring the Fox, Scimitar and South African vehicles. Right now that line is not changing at least for the time being.
2 Likes
