Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

The issue is though, so did a lot of other nations. Like the UK and France.

But whilst the US got 3 new aircraft last major. The UK got 1 and France got none.

This major, its looking like neither Britian nor France is going to get a single new aircraft again.

Which is a real shame because there are some really good aircraft that would be perfect to add now (Like for a naval focused update, something like the Fairey Barracuda or Mosqutio light bomber for Britain for example would pair beautifully with Vanguard )

3 Likes

and i cant even lock 38mt in clear weather smh

mate I meant actual weapon stats not your personal stats

I didn’t misunderstood a bit, as you sneakily tried to place the US and Russia on the same page when it’s not the case.
@Smugspite just handed you some clear evidence on missile performance.

I normally agree with Death, and would if the convo was the US asking for almost anything else.

But the US, UK and many others need new SPAAs(and are justified in asking for some). So his point here doesn’t fit, as it’s not an area they got large numbers of, well, other nations were left out to dry despite there being possible additions.

Tbh I still think US has made/makes more than 3x the variety of aircraft than UK or France

lmaoo

britain and france still have arguably better fighters anyway though

As I say I was teasing, my true option is Idrc about SPAA’s as they are the least played vehicles of mine

Look at the amount of B-52 variants there are

You are not hitting anything with the VT-1 past 7-6 kilometers if the target is maneuvering, both are almost equal in that regard, the only tragedy here is the lack of a tracer on the MIM-146.

And the 50G pull is for the first 3 seconds of the motor burning, it drops to like 20g past 5km and 12g past 8km.

i doubt SLAMRAAM is coming soon, probably winter event
they need to fix alot of old spaa regardless, new spaa doesnt mean old spaa getting neglected

Eh… I dont know. I dont think it would be off by that much tbh. Maybe 2x but more because USAF and USN. But Britain made a lot too. If nothing else, there is certainly no need for some nations to go 2-3 updates with no aircraft and the US to get 4 or 5 aircraft over the same period of time because “they made mroe stuff”

Heck, if we applied that to naval. The UK would get 2 new ships every single major update

1 Like

i actually CAN hit manuvering target at 6-7km with the MIM-146
thats if they dont sling kh-38mt at me

Gaijin is actually capable to neglect big time

So Britain cant get the Fairey Barracuda at BR 2.0 because we have the Typhoon at 14.0?

Thats a pretty weak arugment tbh,

And the US has the F-15C, F-15E, F-16C and F-18C. What more could they possibly want for Top tier. Whislt im still waiting for the Typhoon to get its placeholder radar replaced

3 Likes

Or Sea Hornet N.F.21 my beloved

that does not change the VT-1 is better, the fact is germany shouldn’t be the only 40km SAM but here we are a far better option would have been to give everyone their SAMs that get to 20-25km to test these new features and then push the limit with a 40km SAM which most nations also have options for but instead gaijin has decide to jump straight to 40km which is a terrible idea

2 Likes

exactly which is why im pissed, they add new spaa so they dont have to care about older spaa, because “grind new spaa so u dont have to deal with old spaa”

@quartas121 & @PyroAddict as for an apology I may not offer my hand as I may not get it back, but sorry for that harsh tease

2 Likes