its decent. its also the only CVRT to kinda handle decently if not a bit too slow.
do wish the driving modelling for it were copied onto the scimitar so it can actually function
its decent. its also the only CVRT to kinda handle decently if not a bit too slow.
do wish the driving modelling for it were copied onto the scimitar so it can actually function
He’s just mad about the concept of the US getting a large number of vehicles
ADATS is a very much 11.0 vehicle, it should be lower, but in no world is it a 10.0 SPAA.
British made IFVs that are good are against the ToS
Statistically, the ADATS performs better in KDR, which suggests its doing a better job at the AA role:
→ Places the US and Russia as equals in GRB SPAA-wise
→ Adats can’t even best FlaRakRad on AA duties (the latter is nowhere near the Pantsir).
I never had anything against Deathmisser, so I don’t even know where the hostility has come from suddenly xD
I am lost
I just sat down on the PC, saw someone saying that they were glad U.S wasn’t getting a functional SAM after 6 years, wondered why, and am suddenly getting these responses
if it couldnt kill tanks its actual SPAA capability is that of a 10.7 maybe 10.3 (being worse then OSA)
me when a nation that makes a lot of vehicles irl gets a lot of vehicles in game
Oh snap, has my brother been on here annoying you all ?
Not played it myself but very understandable. I very often see Flarak’s just get completely overwhelmed.
Saying that, seen a Flarak in a game yesterday, absolute champ of a player, he must have intercepted down a dozen Kh38’s / Mav’s that were flying into our spawn. I was in awe lol.
But eventually even he fell to the sheer spam coming at him.
I don’t know, it could’ve been given to any nation, what’s even the point of that question? The only reason I can think of is the fact that the FlaRakRad is the WORST SPAA at top tier, and the only SPAA to only have 2 missiles.
Makes sense that Germany and Israel would be getting strong systems to compensate.
This is not slick
I don’t think statistics should mean anything in a sensible balancing decision.
Now you’re just willingly misunderstanding to keep arguing, im not gonna bother wasting my time anymore with you
more G pull
more range
higher speed
and more explosive mass
bigger trigger radius
and a tracer past 3km
yeah sure “ADATS is statistically better”
I’m just teasing you all and you lot bitten lmao a man have to have fun for one night lol
we all know this isn’t the vehicle.
you’re comparing a minor nations players to the german mains
Can you read what it says
Tell that to the guy who brought up statistics first