It should just be the T-72B3 we have in game but with APS, which likely means it gets bumped up to 12.0.
If they give it the better gearbox they open a can of worms that I doubt they will want to open.
It should just be the T-72B3 we have in game but with APS, which likely means it gets bumped up to 12.0.
If they give it the better gearbox they open a can of worms that I doubt they will want to open.
*People complain incessantly about CAS
*Tank with solution to their problem is added
*People: “Nah Slightly better mobility is definitely more important”
The jokes write themselves.
So where is the WTD61 Eurofighter (IPA7) for Germany then?
That you think the difference between the B3 and 80U is “slightly better” shows your top tier knowledge lol.
I think the difference is so minor it shows how much complaint about the T-72/T-90s vs T-80 debate is a load.
How high does the number need to go?
That’d be the T-72B2 Rogatka, if they decide to add that in future.
I dont get why you people label the B3 Arena as DOA? Would an APS system not be an upgrade for the existing T-72B3? I’ll gladly take it
The difference is pretty massive. It just doesn’t look that way when you fight them and can’t aim against them.
Idiots make the T-90M look good, but that is off topic.
i have no objection against small military training off branches being added to home nations. TopAces, QinetiQ ( ETPS ) and others that im unaware of.
This is not a solution, solution is TO
In some cases where I know i’ll need more armor I take the T-90M over the BVM. That turret aint no joke if you know how to deflect shots correctly (away from breech)
Oh boo-hoo.
Let me play you a sad song on the worlds smallest violin
Oh, so its just useless “hangar dust gatherer” then, sadly.
The solution for now is the new SPAA, which is being partially done now.
Tank only would need to have a massive BR overhaul.
You say this like the F-2 doesnt also have advanced datalink for the position sharing of enemies.
Till we get this:
Object 219M — The T-80BVM’s superior precursor - Suggestions / Ground - War Thunder — official forum
leo2a5 doesnt have neither armor, nor good thermal, not even top shell
t72b3 has both thermal and armor + top shell
le2a5 is 12.0
t72b3 is 11.7
bias?
True, the real solution will be multi vehicle SAM mechanics that will hopefully equal out the fight. If done right, that is.
The 2A5 has DM53, the B3 has 3BM60.
DM53 is better than 3BM60, so how does the B3 have a top shell and the 2A5 not?
Leo 2a5 still has DM53 which is the top shell is it not?